Why This New Race: Ethnic Reasoning in Early Christianity

Don't already have an Oxford Academic account? Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.

It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Sign In or Create an Account. Close mobile search navigation Article navigation. Why This New Race: For permissions, please e-mail: You do not currently have access to this article. You could not be signed in. Sign In Forgot password? Don't have an account? American Academy of Religion members Sign in via society site. Sign in via your Institution Sign in.

Purchase Subscription prices and ordering Short-term Access To purchase short term access, please sign in to your Oxford Academic account above. This article is also available for rental through DeepDyve. Email alerts New issue alert. Refresh and try again.

1. !
2. .
3. Project MUSE - Why This New Race: Ethnic Reasoning in Early Christianity (review)!
4. Etude No.14 - Clarinet.
5. Why This New Race: Ethnic Reasoning in Early Christianity by Denise Kimber Buell;
6. The Gratitude Journal: A 21 Day Challenge to More Gratitude, Deeper Relationships, and Greater Joy (A Life of Gratitude)!
7. ?

Open Preview See a Problem? Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page.

• .
• ;
• .
• Michelangelo A Collection Of Fifteen Pictures And A Portrait Of The Master, With Introduction And Interpretation.
• Who Are The Angels (The Intelligence of The Angels)?
• .
• Documentos del protocolo local (Spanish Edition).

Why This New Race: Why This New Race offers a radical new way of thinking about the origins of Christian identity. Conventional histories have understood Christianity as a religion that from its beginnings sought to transcend ethnic and racial distinctions. Denise Kimber Buell challenges this view by revealing the centrality of ethnicity and race in early definitions of Christianity. Buell's Why This New Race offers a radical new way of thinking about the origins of Christian identity.

See a Problem?

Buell's readings of various texts consider the use of "ethnic reasoning" to depict Christianness as more than a set of shared religious practices and beliefs. By asking themselves, "Why this new race? Buell focuses on texts written before Christianity became legal in C. Philosophers and theologians used ethnic reasoning to define Christians as a distinct people within classical and ancient Near East society and in intra-Christian debates about what constituted Christianness.



Many characterized Christianness as both fixed and fluid-it had a real essence fixed but could be acquired through conversion fluid. Buell demonstrates how this dynamic view of race and ethnicity allowed Christians to establish boundaries around the meaning of Christianness and to develop universalizing claims that all should join the Christian people.

In addressing questions of historiography, Buell analyzes why generations of scholars have refused to acknowledge ethnic reasoning in early Christian discourses. Moreover, Buell's arguments about the importance of ethnicity and religion in early Christianity provide insights into the historical legacy of Christian anti-Semitism as well as contemporary issues of race. Hardcover , pages. Published August 3rd by Columbia University Press first published To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

To ask other readers questions about Why This New Race , please sign up. Lists with This Book. Apr 20, Phil rated it liked it Shelves: I picked up this book a couple of weeks ago at the library, largely because I have been intrigued by the language of nation used by some Christian writers in which Christianity was defined as third race in association with the 'pagans' and the Jews.

Buell places this imagery in the context of race or ethnic reasoning something she explicitly equates which s I picked up this book a couple of weeks ago at the library, largely because I have been intrigued by the language of nation used by some Christian writers in which Christianity was defined as third race in association with the 'pagans' and the Jews. Buell places this imagery in the context of race or ethnic reasoning something she explicitly equates which served various functions in early Christianity to help define both who was and who was not part of the Christian community.

Her analysis is informed by modern scholarship of race and has the secondary objective to expose modern racial thinking in the portrayal of early Christianity and, especially, Judaism. The ensuing discussion is heavily influenced by post modern theories of race as much as the sources themselves.

Ravi Zacharias on the Christian View of Homosexuality #Apologetics

The interweaving of these themes create some interesting comparisons and insights and make this book well worth reading. I should note that this approach can also make this a rather dense book, so be prepared for a fair amount of theory as well as source work. I do worry about a couple things in this book.



• CHERUB: Maximum Security: Book 3 (CHERUB Series)?
• Guide des archives du Sénégal colonial (Études africaines) (French Edition).
• Boxed Set 1 Natural Skin Product Recipes (Natural Skin Recipes Book 8).
• The Catholic Historical Review.
• Companion Book for Translators and Interpreters: Automotive.
• .

First, the concept of race is a rather post-modern one, emphasizing the fluidity of the concept of race, rather than its fixed nature as in a more modernist approach. That worries a bit because the key Greek word that Dr. Buell uses for race is genos which is notoriously open-ended in meaning.

There are times when I wonder if the term genos in seeming to mean everything, so means nothing. And if we add the amorphousness of the post-modern concept of race, that impression is increased. I'm not saying Dr. Buell is wrong to use race here, but the effort is rather like nailing jello to the wall. The only second concern I have is with the secondary objective that Dr.

Buell mentions about re-defining the relationship between Christians and Jews today. Now, that is an excellent objective and one that I support. Christians should be thinking more about how they express their differences with their Jewish neighbours and the tendency to establish Judaism as particular and bound to race, while Christianity was universal and free from racial distinctions doesn't, as Dr. Buell points out, doesn't reflect the fluidity in the relationships between Christians and Jews in antiquity. That is fair enough, but what worries me is when history is written to solve a modern or even post-modern collective sin, the danger of distortion grows considerably.

Buell is an excellent scholar, so that danger is kept in check, but I worry about danger of anachronism when applying admittedly very modernist concepts into an ancient world. Buell is right that the concepts behind our concepts on race are discernible in embryonic form in the early Christian period, but it is important to recognize that they are embryonic, not fully developed and that there was no particular reason why they had to develop the way they did.

Modern concepts of race and of Judaism may well have been conceived in the early Christian period, but they are also peculiarly contingent on the preoccupations and assumptions of the modern and post-modern eras, so there is a danger of over-reading the intellectual realities of later times into the evidence. Despite these caveats, Dr.

Buell's book is well worth reading. While rather densely written, it forces a reconsideration of the role of race in developing our concept of Christian identity. Jul 30, Sarah rated it it was amazing Shelves: This is one of those contemporary scholarly volumes that seems to pop up everywhere in the field--in this case, with very good reason.