Lesson Plans The Beekeepers Apprentice, or, on the Segregation of the Queen

I could have been generous and gotten past all that for the pleasure of seeing Holmes thrown for a loop. And I'm talking platonically ; everyone can be straight in this story for all I care. But gone is the Holmes who "should be lost without my Boswell"; King actually has Holmes forget to warn Watson that he's in danger from a bomber who's targeting Holmes' friends—though he rushed to Mary's side—and nearly costs the condescendingly-called "Uncle John" his life.

Why is this kind of character assassination necessary? It's possible to make new friends and find new lovers without shitting all over the old ones, and to insist otherwise seems so amateurish, the worst kind of rookie fic writer mistake.

Study Pack

I'm actually kind of curious to see where this series goes; King, to her credit, takes it suitably slow, and I want to be convinced by the possibility of Holmes falling for someone. Who can resist incredibly brilliant but emotionally fucked up people in love? But any further reading of this series is going to be at least somewhat masochistic for me. View all 19 comments. Sep 18, Felicia rated it it was amazing Shelves: I got fixated on Holmes and needed this book. What a great reinterpretation of Holmes and his young apprentice, who grows to become his equal.

The partnership that is formed between the two of them is so organic and believable, and Mary Russell is a whip-smart protagonist that I rooted for on every page. Aug 03, Stephen rated it really liked it Shelves: I went through a lot of turmoil both in deciding to read this book and then while I was reading it. They have been a bit dry for my taste.

Well I started the book and was instantly taken with both the character of Mary Russell and the prose and writing style of Laurie King. Now during the course of actually reading the novel, which has the duo of Holmes and Russell investigating several mysteries, I did find parts of it that were dry and plodding and had me leaning towards giving the book a 3 star rating.

Thus, all in all I thought that 4 stars was a pretty accurate representation of how I felt about the book. However, I think most people will agree that the prose is excellent, the characters are very well drawn and the achievement of taking a character like Holmes who is so incredibly well known and show him in a new and fresh light while keeping him completely recognizable was superbly down. For that point alone, Ms King gets Recommended!!! Mary Russell, also known as The Beekeeper's Apprentice , proves to be a wonderful addition to the Sherlock Holmes mythos!

When year-old Mary Russell almost tripped over the peculiar man while he was obsessively studying his bees, she never imagined such an accidental and clumsy encounter would change her life forever! But as it turns out, that man was semi-retired detective Sherlock Holmes, and when the precocious Mary is able to match wits with him both with her deductive reasoning and her Mary Russell, also known as The Beekeeper's Apprentice , proves to be a wonderful addition to the Sherlock Holmes mythos!

But as it turns out, that man was semi-retired detective Sherlock Holmes, and when the precocious Mary is able to match wits with him both with her deductive reasoning and her acerbic wit , a friendship begins to bloom. After training with Holmes for the next few years, Mary proves to be a valuable enough student that Holmes lets her begin to work with him on cases. However, when Mary's contributions manage to thwart the machinations of a rising figure in the criminal underworld, Mary earns a new admirer!

An admirer who understands exactly how much of a threat Mary can be. And now this unseen adversary wants to make sure that Mary's next case is also her last I shan't tell a lie, I went into this book with some apprehension As it turns out, my fears were for naught! Laurie King does such a masterful job writing about Sherlock Holmes and his new apprentice, that I often found myself checking the cover to make absolutely sure it wasn't really written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle!

The book begins with an editor's note from Laurie King, informing us that the following story was not written by her at all, but rather was pieced together from documents written by an "M. Laurie claims to have stumbled upon these writings in a mysterious package and has no idea if the events are partially or even at all true! Some might see this is a cop-out, but upon reading the book, I felt that King's rather odd claim worked beautifully with the story.

There are times that Mary seems just a little too good at everything But by giving us this disclaimer, the reader can now choose to believe that if Mary seems just a little too perfect, it may be simply be because she's embellishing things slightly not too hard to believe, considering that Mary often comes across as arrogant, even in her "own" writings. Perhaps this truly was a cop-out by Laurie King, but I still felt it managed to enhance the story rather than detract from it. One thing that really amazed me about Mary was how she managed to be both amazing and flawed!

Yes, she's brilliant, she's courageous Mary is very effectively portrayed as some who's just a little too smart for her own good, someone who knows so much about the world but still manages to feel like an outsider in it. By developing such a multi-faceted character, the author successfully gives Holmes a perfect companion, someone who shares many of his own talents and quirks.

Another thing I really enjoyed was how the relationship between Mary and Holmes progressed. Rather than just throw Mary immediately into the action, King chooses to have Mary work on a couple of much smaller cases first. Once Mary proves her mettle, Holmes allows her to join him in his investigation of the kidnapping of an American senator's daughter.

Throughout that case, Mary again demonstrates what a valuable asset she is to Holmes. One of my biggest turn-offs in novels is when a relationship develops just a little too quickly not a fan of the "insta-love" plot device, as many of my past reviews will collaborate. So imagine my delight when I found that Russell's partnership with Holmes was paced so effectively! It really did feel like I was watching a student grow as a detective throughout the novel, rather than watching a character get thrust into the spotlight just a little too quickly!

As for the story itself, I felt Laurie King knocked it out of the park! The mysteries are enthralling, and the dialogue is full of wit. The set-ups of all the various cases are quite clever, and the way Holmes and Russell solve them, even more so. In addition, there is a lot in here that will please just about any Sherlock Holmes fan.

The book almost plays like a "greatest hits" version of the original Holmes mysteries, with Holmes and now Russell often donning disguises, cracking codes and analyzing clues just like in Doyle's mysteries. Also, many significant characters in the Sherlock Holmes mythos are referenced. Some actually make an appearance, and others are merely mentioned, but it's more than enough to prove Laurie King didn't just slap Holmes in her book to make it sell better.

King truly has an intimate knowledge of Doyle's work. And I must confess, all the nods to the earlier Holmes stories made this Baker Street Irregular smile on many an occasion. King even does a masterful job with her prose. When Holmes and Russell make an unexpected side-trip to Palestine late in the novel, I feared that King was about to make a huge misstep and was throwing this in merely to prolong the mystery.

But as it turned out, this act contained one of the most poignant moments between Holmes and Russell, involving a revelation the two sleuths come to after a particularly aggressive game of chess. Also, King's descriptions of the surroundings are quite poetic at times and lends an additional layer of beauty to everything. Remarkably, King pulls this off while writing this all from the egotistical Mary's point-of-view! There are times when the narrator seems almost cruel to the people she interact with particularly Dr. Watson, whom Mary seems to view as a rival who needs to be cut-down by her.

But even in these moments, King pulls off a tremendous balancing act, where it comes off not as if King herself is disrespecting Watson, but rather Mary's own insecurities that are seeping through in her rather harsh observations. A magical continuation of the Sherlock Holmes legend!

If you've ever read a Sherlock Holmes book Mary Russell says, "I don't know why Mr. Green keeps saying I'm egotistical, that's simply not true! Now if you'll excuse me, I must continue reading my own book and admiring how awesome I am!!! View all 12 comments. Jul 12, Aileen Frost rated it did not like it Shelves: Let me begin by saying that I am a huge fan of mystery novels.

I really wanted to like this book, and hoped that it would propel me into a new and exciting mystery series. How wrong I was. This book is nothing but a fanfic that was lucky enough to be published because the main characters are ou Let me begin by saying that I am a huge fan of mystery novels. This book is nothing but a fanfic that was lucky enough to be published because the main characters are out of copyright. The narrator's voice is arrogant, condescending and generally annoying. I found her unlikeable in the extreme.

1. The Beekeeper's Apprentice;
2. The Beekeeper's Apprentice, or, on the Segregation of the Queen Summary.
3. Fun Activities for Teaching The Beekeeper's Apprentice, or, on the Segregation of the Queen.
4. Challenging the More Able Language User (Nace/Fulton Publication).
5. The Beekeeper's Apprentice, or, on the Segregation of the Queen Test | Final Test - Medium!

Since a large part of the novel involves Mary being in danger, it lead me to not really care what happened in the story. The first third is "Mary Russell - the most wonderful, smart, independent girl in the world who is lucky enough to befriend Sherlock Holmes". I love good character development, but it needs to occur within the context of the plot, not have pages upon pages dedicated to it and not allow the story to progress. The writing style of the author is drawn out in such a way that it takes you out of the action.

What should take a sentence or two to describe seems to take the author at least a page. And in the middle of the most exciting part of the book, Holmes and Mary decide to go on holiday in Palistine WHY would you break up the momentum of the story like that? When the culprit is finally revealed, it is out of left field. There is no way for the reader to be able to go back and see how the enemy did it. The author even has the audacity to claim the importance of the culprit to Mary in the final pages of the book.

If this person wasn't important enough for more than the required passing mention, then they really aren't important to the story. Finally, my two biggest grievances. The first is the horror that I felt when I realized that Laurie King was gearing up for a full-fledged romance to bud between a 17 year old girl and a something year old man. That's when it truly became a teenage girl's fanfic. I don't understand why King couldn't have let Mary view Sherlock as a father figure.

Why did the romance have to come into it? The second really heinous thing that Ms. I don't know what her beef is, but I do know that anyone writing a book using the characters of Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson should do Sir Arthur Conan Doyle the courtesy of actually reading his short stories and novels and not rely on how the characters have been portrayed in the movies and on TV.

It is obvious that Ms. King did not understand the relationship of Watson and Holmes to each other. She treated Watson as though he was a dim-witted second cousin that is to be pitied. Mary continually refers to "Uncle John" as a doddering old fool, something that made me want to fling the book across the room. She had Mary belittle Watson and explain that Holmes just barely tolerated him.

The Beekeeper's Apprentice, or, on the Segregation of the Queen

It was that bad that she had Holmes completely forget about Watson at a critical momemt, choosing to have him be so concerned about Mary's life that it isn't until perfect Mary Sue - I mean Mary Russell - reminds him of Watson that he even remembers that Watson's life is in danger. King - do your research before destroying beloved characters. I will not be reading anymore of this series. View all 6 comments. I'm not sure I'll read the next ones in the series, but The Beekeeper's Apprentice was even better than I expected. More detailed comment to follow!

View all 3 comments. Jul 21, Phrynne rated it liked it.

This was an easy read, nicely written with some interesting characters but a couple of problems for me. Firstly I was uncomfortable with Mary only being fifteen. She is a very mature fifteen but it seemed far fetched that she could have had the freedom to do as she does in this story. Secondly I struggled with her relationship with Holmes. None o This was an easy read, nicely written with some interesting characters but a couple of problems for me. None of these worked for me. I wish the story had started with Mary as at least Consequently I quite liked this book but will probably not seek out the rest of the series.

Nov 14, BrokenTune rated it did not like it Shelves: Ok, I got to page 60 and am calling it quits. The Watson bashing is already in full swing. There is a scene that was basically copied out of Pride and Prejudice. This is all wrong and too disturbing. I'm sorry, I am just not compatible with pastiche when it concerns my favourite characters. View all 9 comments. Posted at The Literary Lawyer. The Beekeeper's Apprentice fits that bill.

It takes a tried and true character in Sherlock Holmes and adds a spunky young feminist into the mix. The result is an excellent novel with nuanced and complex characters. If you like your mysteries to be character driven, this one may be right up your alley. Plot summary The story is told from the perspective of one Mary Russell. It chronicles her meeting with and formation of her partnership with a 54 year old Sherlock Holmes. Holmes has been retired for many years now and spends his days tending his beehives, running his experiments and writing his magnum opus on forensic science.

Mary meets Holmes as a teenaged girl. She has a quick wit and is intellectually gifted. Her and Holmes come to develop a lasting relationship. The stories covers Mary's "apprentice years" while she learns from Holmes and attends Oxford to study Chemistry and Religion. Along the way, the pair deals with some minor crimes and small cases until a bomber forces Mary's training to come to a head and requires that Holmes rely on the skills he has taught Mary. The Good The characters are superb. I am not a Sherlock Holmes fan. In fact, this is the first book I have ever read that had Holmes as a character.

I cannot say that if fan of Sherlock Holmes will find the portrayal entertaining or sacrilegious.

The author makes it clear that not everything you have read about Sherlock is true. While Holmes is an interesting character, the real focus is Mary Russell. She is a complex character with a painful past. This first book in this series is really a coming of age story for Mary Russell. A young strong headed feminist teenage meets the famous and talented Mr. The novel was beautifully situation in its historical setting. Much of the story was set against the backdrop of World War I and the novel dealt in part with the realities in Britain during that period of time. The story's historical resonance added another layer to this complex novel.

The Bad From time to time, the internal logic of the story did not make sense and the characters would occasionally give mixed messages. For example, Mary Russell begins the story with a narrative of Holmes and Watson and is rather disparaging of the later and his mental acuity. Later on in the story, she indicates how incredibly fond she is of Watson and refers to him as Uncle John. There were several such incidents which took away from the overall story.

The biggest fault, in my opinion, was the final confrontation with the ultimate villain. It came off as rather stereotypical and was somewhat anticlimactic after the long cat and mouse game. I was disappointed that the pair did not discover the motivation of the villain and pass it along to the reader. The author instead chose to use the gloating villain who info dumps the entire plan and motivation.

The final confrontation did not live up to what I would expect from Holmes and Russell. Can this Book Stand Alone Definitely. This is the first in the series and is self contained. Final Thoughts Overall, this was an excellent and thoroughly enjoyable historical mystery.

Multiple Choice Questions

The characters made the novel and I look forward to continuing the series. If you are looking for a story that deals with the later years of Sherlock Holmes or paints him is a bit of a different light, you will enjoy this story. Audiobook Notes Jenny Sterlin gives a five star performance. She is one of the best female narrators I have heard.

She does an excellent job with the male voices and especially that of Sherlock Holmes. The writing and language in the novel is quite proper and period specific English. She handled it deftly and it was a pleasant listening experience. I make an effort to give you the information so you can make an informed decision before reading. I am simply giving approximations. Scale 1 - Lowest 5 - Highest Sex - 1. There are rumours that insinuate Holmes and Russell are in an inappropriate relationship and a couple of scenes of awkward tension where one party needs to change or clean in front of someone of the opposite sex.

Overall, it is appropriate for all ages. Language - 2 Minor obscenities and language specific to the date and time. Appropriate for all ages. There are physical injuries from bombings and injuries from beatings. There are several deaths after struggles and there is some psychological violence from kidnappings and hostage situations. View all 20 comments. An enjoyable mystery with a young, brilliant Mary Russell meeting middle-aged Sherlock Holmes, and eventually becoming his apprentice.

The book covers a series of fairly benign, short cases the two work on together, with Mary demonstrating intelligence, quick-thinking and an inclination for action. Mary also frequently takes Sherlock to task for his at times Victorian attitudes towards women. She's smart, forthright, sensible, hardworking, and an enjoyable character to spend time wi She's smart, forthright, sensible, hardworking, and an enjoyable character to spend time with. Sherlock is often irritating and I enjoyed every time Mary figuratively thwacked him for his behaviour. The final case takes place over several months, and is interesting enough, though I found that the story veered right into melodrama like a s Hollywood film at its denouement.

One of the weaknesses of the original Sherlock Holmes canon is that Doyle doesn't offer much in the way of female characters. The only woman Holmes genuinely admired, Irene Adler, appears only in "A Scandal in Bohemia;" Watson married at the end of The Sign of Four , but his wife's presence doesn't bulk very large in the novels and stories half the time, Doyle apparently didn't remember whether Watson was supposed to be married or not, just as he couldn't remember if the doctor's war wound was i One of the weaknesses of the original Sherlock Holmes canon is that Doyle doesn't offer much in the way of female characters.

The only woman Holmes genuinely admired, Irene Adler, appears only in "A Scandal in Bohemia;" Watson married at the end of The Sign of Four , but his wife's presence doesn't bulk very large in the novels and stories half the time, Doyle apparently didn't remember whether Watson was supposed to be married or not, just as he couldn't remember if the doctor's war wound was in his leg or his shoulder; that, and the fact that the author didn't write his Holmes works in chronological order, has created critical confusion as to whether there were actually two Mrs. Hudson, of course, is Holmes' ever-dependable landlady, and there is the occasional female client, witness, etc.

King has remedied this defect admirably in the person of Mary Russell, an eminently round and appealing character, a narrator who unlike Watson is as smart as Holmes --who isn't as "retired" as the above description suggests. This character-driven Holmes pastiche is actually better than the original novels, IMO, though very faithful to Doyle's characterizations of Holmes, Mycroft, Watson, etc.

It spans several years, taking Mary up to college age the whip-smart girl ultimately becomes an Oxford theology student --King is herself an Episcopal seminary graduate, so there's something of the author in the character , so the plot involves more than one mystery for the pair to solve together; but the climactic one will be more than sufficiently harrowing, intellectually demanding and close to home, even if it doesn't fill the whole book.

View all 8 comments. Sherlock Holmes is now a retired beekeeper residing in Sussex Downs. Despite the fact that he is retired, his mind is still just as sharp and he still assists the police in solving local 4. Despite the fact that he is retired, his mind is still just as sharp and he still assists the police in solving local cases. Sherlock Holmes meets Mary Russell the narrator , a 15 year old young woman, one day and recognizes her as a like-minded individual almost instantly.

Despite her young age, despite the fact that she is female, she quickly becomes an equal to Sherlock which is quite a change when compared to the relationship between Sherlock and Watson. That might have taken twenty frustrating minutes with Watson. Their dry humor and verbal sparring was delightful. The progression of their relationship was lovely and despite the fact that it could be construed as inevitable it was still a delight to witness.

Reminders of my femininity always took him by surprise. However, I could not hold him to blame, for they took me by surprise as well. This has absolutely become one of my favorites and I will definitely be continuing this series. Thank you Maja for the recommendation. Aug 15, Kim rated it really liked it Shelves: Since joining Goodreads I've discovered a taste for all sorts of books which I would have ignored only a year ago.

Some books which I've read over the past few months have simply not come my way before. Others I have made a conscious decision at some point in the past not to read, but have changed my mind about, encouraged by positive reviews or a desire to participate in a group read.

This book falls into the second category. Years ago I read and enjoyed King's Kate Martinelli series although Since joining Goodreads I've discovered a taste for all sorts of books which I would have ignored only a year ago. Years ago I read and enjoyed King's Kate Martinelli series although I would be hard pressed to remember much about that series now other than it was set in San Francisco. However, when I first picked up The Beekeeper's Apprentice in a book store, I put it down again because I don't like anything which smacks of fan fiction and I don't like historical crime fiction.

Well, that's what I told myself anyway. Now, having read the first book in this series years after it appeared because Goodreads friends whose opinion I value rated it highly, I realise that pre-conceptions can get in the way of genuine literary enjoyment. While I'm still not keen on fan fiction as such, King's skill as a writer overcomes my prejudices in that regard. Her skill as a writer also makes me realise that maybe I don't mind historical crime fiction after all. There are many things I enjoyed about this novel.

I like the characters: Holmes and Russell are interesting and well-developed and while Russell has a bit of the Mary Sue about her, it wasn't enough to make me dislike her. Other characters are less well-developed, but no less so than in most crime fiction novels. I like the episodic nature of the mystery, which has a somewhat over-the-top but nevertheless satisfying resolution. I like the wit and the occasional humour. I like the fact that King didn't feel obliged to overdo the period setting with unnecessary detail. All in all, this was a really enjoyable read and I'm looking forward to Book 2.

I suspect that readers with some familiarity with and liking for the Sherlock Holmes stories would get more out of this series than readers coming to the books with no such background. I also suspect that those who are passionate devotees of Sherlock Holmes would not be as keen - they'd probably have too much to criticise! I absolutely hated the style of narration. Mary narrates her own story 75 years later. There are SO many incomplete stories and thoughts. I did it in one sentence!

The Beekeeper's Apprentice, or, on the Segregation of the Queen Fun Activities

My one goal when playing chess is to lose in the fewest moves possible. Actually, while trying to finish the book, I let it expire at the library…twice. View all 7 comments. Dec 26, Alice rated it it was amazing Shelves: This series of which this book is the first follows the exploits of a young woman called Mary Russell living in the earlier half of the twentieth century. This books begins in Mary is an orphan living with her aunt, whom she doesn't get along with, in the English countryside. One day while wandering the Sussex Downs reading Virgil, she nearly steps on a man lying on the ground observing bees.

His name is Sherlock Holmes. King handles the inclusion of Holmes well, she even states that thi This series of which this book is the first follows the exploits of a young woman called Mary Russell living in the earlier half of the twentieth century. King handles the inclusion of Holmes well, she even states that this is a Holmes in character much changed from Conan Doyles'. He is much older, world weary, and mocking of what he considers Watson's romantic and sensationalist writings.

However, this is really Mary's book and series and how she grows with the aid of her mentor. Within each other the the emotionally scarred but highly intellectual Mary and the brilliant Holmes find kindred spirits. Together this unlikely partnership begins solving crimes though the development of their relationship is as much in the forefront of this book. I loved the prose and the way each character held their own distinct voice, even the secondary ones like Mrs. And Mary, while being a young half-American Jewish feminist, doesn't seem false like many other such heroines.

She is not a twenty-first century heroine transplanted, but rather remains true to the limitations of her class and times. Sep 19, Hannah rated it liked it Shelves: It takes skill and a healthy dose of respect to do it well. Author Laurie King shows off all of these traits in abundance in her debut novel featuring famed and beloved master detective Sherlock Holmes and his sidekick John Watson Mary Russell. Yep, you heard me, Mary Russell: King pays homage to all that is best about Conan Doyle's literary creation, but adds a bit of spunk and feminine can-do with the introduction of Mary.

Their initial meeting, Holmes' tutelage of his protege, their crime solving escapades all make for an entertaining read. Beyond that, her characterization of Holmes feels "right" to this fan of the original stories. I would have rated it higher but for a sloppy and "out-of-left-field" unmasking of the villain, IMO.

Otherwise, it's great to know I have a new series to dive into, especially one of this caliber. View all 17 comments. A witty, big-hearted book narrated by Sherlock Holmes's teenage apprentice-cum-partner, Mary Russell. It was a delight to be party to Russell and Holmes's verbal parrying and dry humor. Mary Russell is a heroine that would be hard not to love, with her unapologetic independence and rampant bookwormery. The dialogue from both main characters is delicious. I love passages like this, after Mary asks Holmes if her presence is inconvenient they do make an odd pair: It is, I can even say, a new and occasionally remarkable experience to work with a person who inspires, not by vacuum, but by actual contribution You cannot help being female, and I should be something of a fool as well were I to discount your talents merely because of their housing.

I'm sure there are subtexts that passed me by, but my ignorance didn't detract from the reading experience. I'm curious to know how fans of Doyle's Holmes feel about this series. Jul 07, Lizzie rated it it was ok Shelves: I know I read some, maybe all, of the Holmes stories when I was a kid.

1. The Man Who Died (Annotated)!
2. Only Between Us?
3. Nadys Secrets: Her Journey to Sexual Freedom;
4. The Beekeeper's Apprentice, or, on the Segregation of the Queen Test | Final Test - Medium?
5. Dear Ms. King.
6. Get A Copy.
7. .

My knowledge of Sherlock Holmes is mostly from the movies, though, including that unfortunate picture in which Basil Rathbone, I mean Holmes, fights the Nazis. I just googled and there are three Holmes vs. Nazi movies, for god's sake. Anyway, this is a perfectly adequate mystery and I'm deliberately damning with faint praise , but the book is more about the relationship between Holmes and Mary Russell than about the mystery I know I read some, maybe all, of the Holmes stories when I was a kid. This test consists of 5 multiple choice questions, 5 short answer questions, and 10 short essay questions.

How far is Jerusalem from Acre? Which of Mary's tutors are absent when she returns to Oxford after being in Palestine? What is the name of the library clerk who tells Mary at the end of Chapter 16 that the library is closing? How is Holmes disguised at the beginning of Chapter 17? Where did the relative live who left John Dickson an inheritance? What base does Mary use to crack the code of the Roman numerals left on the seat of the wrecked cab? Who beat and colonized Palestine in the third millennium B. What food does Mary smell when she arrives with Holmes at his house after the drive from Oxford?

When was the last time that Mary saw the pair of shoes that are in the package of clothing delivered to Scotland Yard? When the watchers leave Sussex and Holmes picks through the garbage they leave behind, where does Holmes learn that all the stuff came from? Hudson be protected when she returns to care for Holmes's house in Sussex? How does Holmes act when he and Mary go to the opera at Covent Gardens? How does Mary's driving affect Holmes as they drive toward Sussex? What is in a package that is delivered to the front desk of Scotland Yard in Chapter 12?

What vital piece of evidence does Holmes miss when he examines the parcel, note, and clothing that are delivered to the Yard for Mary? What impression of Holmes does the suicide note give that Miss Donleavy wrote for Holmes? How did John Dickson change after he received an inheritance? Why is Mary worried about pretending to be alienated from Holmes? What are three possibilities that may explain the intentions of the mastermind behind the bombings and attacks upon Mary, Holmes, Watson, and the cab? In a story Mary tells, what does Judith do to save her people from Holofernes?

View all Lesson Plans available from BookRags. View the Study Pack.