Incarnation is Creation is Evolution is Incarnation
In this sphere all matter is spiritualised and eternalised. We humans are the numinous, thinking, self aware, reflective, decision making organ of this system. Deep within us, but not necessarily recognised as such, is implanted a strong attraction to and a deep yearning for that loving unity. This gift of free will, the freedom to make decisions is both wonderful and dangerous as the history of our race reveals.
I think the maturation process of the individual is a good model for the development of the human species. When we were born into this world, like all mammals, we were totally self absorbed, totally needy, totally dependent on those around us to satisfy our needs. As we grew and our minds developed we became aware of others as separate from us. Gradually, we learned that others had needs of their own and rights of their own. Slowly and not without struggle and pain, we learned - to a degree - to acknowledge and respect the needs and rights of others.
There are factors which increase or slow down this proc-ess. The more an individual experiences love and examples of loving the faster that individual learns to love. The less exposure to love the slower progress in loving will be. This maturing process, this learning and the response it requires from us is the source of our, life—long struggle with selfishness and is at the heart of what we call virtue and sin. If this is true for the individual it is true for the human species as a whole.
The Incarnation a Profound Cosmic Event
In the context of We know that everything God made is good. As human persons we continue to grow in conscious awareness, discovering the gifts of reflection, discernment and the power to choose. At some stage in our early life we came to a moment when with full knowledge and awareness we chose to do what we knew to be wrong.
We committed our personal original sin. I think this is also the story of the human race. Each altruistic or loving choice contributes to the growth of the kingdom of God on earth. Each selfish choice creates the culture or environment of sin, the kingdom of darkness. Across the centuries these two cultures have developed and deepened and we are all immersed in the struggle the pull or attraction of both.
I wonder if the human race is not so much a fallen race as an incomplete race. Our evolutionary journey is as yet incomplete. Is it incomplete because it requires the full cooperation of the human species for this phase of evolution? Is it yet incomplete because it requires the ingredient of self-giving love? When the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us in the person of Jesus. He received sinners and outcasts with love, compassion and respect. He taught ceaselessly the values of the Kingdom of heaven and left us a wonderful legacy of inspiration, example and teachings on the kingdom of heaven on earth.
- SEO for WordPress Power Bloggers;
- ?
- The CIO Challenge: Deliver Business Value with IT! – Run: - Aligned to described ITIL activities and processes with a Service Strategy (The CIO Challenge: Deliver Business Value with IT!h Book 6)?
- Re-visiting the notion of Deep Incarnation in light of 1 Corinthians and emergence theory?
- .
- ?
- .
Jesus died because of our sins. When we consider the circumstances leading to his death we note that the spiritual leaders of the time were threatened by him. His life was a reproach to them. He spoke the truth and they hated him for it. They were jealous, proud, arrogant men, afraid of losing power and control. They were too proud to listen to an itinerant preacher. Scientific accounts of the origin of the universe , the origin of life , and subsequent evolution of pre-human life forms may not cause any difficulty but the need to reconcile religious and scientific views of hominization and to account for the addition of a soul to humans remains a problem.
Theistic evolution typically postulates a point at which a population of hominids who had or may have evolved by a process of natural evolution acquired souls and thus with their descendants became fully human in theological terms. This group might be restricted to Adam and Eve , or indeed to Mitochondrial Eve , although versions of the theory allow for larger populations.
Navigation menu
The point at which such an event occurred should essentially be the same as in paleoanthropology and archeology , but theological discussion of the matter tends to concentrate on the theoretical. The term " special transformism " is sometimes used to refer to theories that there was a divine intervention of some sort, achieving hominization. Several 19th-century theologians and evolutionists attempted specific solutions, including the Catholics John Augustine Zahm and St.
George Jackson Mivart , but tended to come under attack from both the theological and biological camps.
- Explorations in Biblical Theology from J. Richard Middleton?
- Sincronismo Creativo Catalogo Opere 2013 (Italian Edition);
- A different way to think about Jesus–evolutionary thoughts about incarnation!
- .
- Theistic evolution - Wikipedia.
- .
- Resist (The Silo Archipelago Series Book 2);
- .
- Kinderbuch Mama: Geschenke für Dich Mama: Der Kinderbuch zum Lesen und Vorlesen, kostenlose kinderbücher, bilderbücher kinder, kinderbücher kostenlos, ... books in German 4) (German Edition)?
- Great Family Food!
The American botanist Asa Gray used the name "theistic evolution" in a now-obsolete sense for his point of view, presented in his book Essays and Reviews Pertaining to Darwinism. St George Jackson Mivart argued instead in his On the Genesis of Species that the deity, equipped with foreknowledge, sets the direction of evolution orthogenesis by specifying the laws that govern it, and leaves species to evolve according to the conditions they experience as time goes by.
Larson stated that the theory failed as an explanation in the minds of biologists from the late 19th century onwards as it broke the rules of methodological naturalism which they had grown to expect. The major criticism of theistic evolution by non-theistic evolutionists focuses on its essential belief in a supernatural creator. These critics argue that by the application of Occam's razor , sufficient explanation of the phenomena of evolution is provided by natural processes in particular, natural selection , and the intervention or direction of a super natural entity is not required.
A number of notable proponents of theistic evolution, including Kenneth R.
Theistic evolution
Ayala , and Francis Collins are critics of intelligent design. Young Earth creationists including Ken Ham criticise theistic evolution on theological grounds, [50] [51] finding it hard to reconcile the nature of a loving God with the process of evolution, in particular, the existence of death and suffering before the Fall of Man.
They consider that it undermines central biblical teachings by regarding the creation account as a myth, a parable, or an allegory, instead of treating it as historical. They also fear that a capitulation to what they call " atheistic " naturalism will confine God to the gaps in scientific explanations, undermining biblical doctrines, such as God's incarnation through Christ.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Views that regard religious teachings about God as compatible with modern scientific understanding about biological evolution.
A different way to think about Jesus–evolutionary thoughts about incarnation | Tikkun Magazine
Old Earth Day-age Gap Progressive. Book of Genesis Creation narrative Framework interpretation As an allegory. Created kind Flood geology Creationist cosmologies Intelligent design. History Creation myth Public education "Teach the Controversy". This article is about a religious viewpoint in the creation—evolution controversy. For a discussion of the evolution of theism, see Evolutionary psychology of religion. Alternatives to evolution by natural selection.
Religious views of Charles Darwin. Acceptance of evolution by religious groups. Understanding Science and the Theology of Creation.
Retrieved 25 April The most important word in the term evolutionary creation is the noun "creation". These Christian evolutionists are first and foremost thoroughly committed and unapologetic creationists. They believe that the world is a creation that is absolutely dependent for every instant of its existence on the will and grace of the Creator. The qualifying word in this category is the adjective "evolutionary", indicating simply the method through which the Lord made the cosmos and living organisms. This view of origins is often referred to as "theistic evolution".
However, such a word arrangement places the process of evolution as the primary term, and makes the Creator secondary as merely a qualifying adjective. Numbers , p. Evolving Christian Views of Species". Creationism and the Origin of Species. Center for Origins Research Issues in Creation: In his Disquisitio de Sexu Plantarum , Linnaeus had argued that the genera were the original units of creation and that the species within them had originated by subsequent hybridization.
In , he dropped his famous maxim about the permanance of species from the final edition of the Systema Naturae. But the original Creation was still that of a multitude of forms, distinct then and forever. Darwin, Charles []. Landmarks of science 5 ed. Retrieved 9 December Page , fifteen lines from top, after 'deceitful guide,' [ Nevertheless, all living things have much in common; in their chemical composition, their germinal vesicles, their cellular structure, and their laws of growth and reproduction.
Clarendon Press, , pp. Public Acceptance of Evolution". Peter Eardley and Carl Still, Aquinas: A Guide for the Perplexed London: Continuum, , pp. In contrast, Dharmic religions Buddhism, Hinduism, Jainism teach that all biological organisms have souls which pass from one life to another in the Transmigration of souls.
Retrieved 12 November Note that "special creation of man" in Catholic references is a far more restricted concept than " special creation " q. Each of these has a chapter in Artigas: All are also covered by Brundell. The Beginning of All Things: Meanwhile, theology had withdrawn from asserting the direct creation of the whole world by God: Finally - it seems today - a direct intervention in the development of the world and human beings is dispensed with altogether.
The English philosopher Antony Flew was unfortunately right when he stated that through this constantly repeated strategy of protection and withdrawal with which we are familiar and which for long decades kept young Catholics especially from the study of biology 'which endangers the faith' , the hypothesis of God was being 'killed by inches, the death of a thousand qualifications.
It isn't surprising that it is increasingly being put in question. The Remarkable History of Scientific Theory. Essays and Reviews Pertaining to Darwinism. The Reign of Law. The New Answers Book: Did God Use Evolution? Observations from a Scientist of Faith. This article's use of external links may not follow Wikipedia's policies or guidelines. Please improve this article by removing excessive or inappropriate external links, and converting useful links where appropriate into footnote references. April Learn how and when to remove this template message.
Evolutionary history of life Index of evolutionary biology articles Introduction Outline of evolution Timeline of evolution.
Services on Demand
Canalisation Evolutionary developmental biology Inversion Modularity Phenotypic plasticity. Cell DNA Flagella Eukaryotes symbiogenesis chromosome endomembrane system mitochondria nucleus plastids In animals eye hair auditory ossicle nervous system brain. Renaissance and Enlightenment Transmutation of species Charles Darwin On the Origin of Species History of paleontology Transitional fossil Blending inheritance Mendelian inheritance The eclipse of Darwinism Modern synthesis History of molecular evolution Extended evolutionary synthesis.