Harry Stottle - Philosopher of The Manor
But as you increase the number of bits of resolution, and use it in a larger number of calculations, it becomes more difficult for people to apply. You may think that promiscuity is the tendency to engage in sexual behavior, but inside the computer, promiscuity is defined by its uses:. Emily, the method you describe is a standard method in AI and has been applied successfully to many problems.
The core problem with this method is that it works best with long combinations of a few fundamental actions. For example, the algorithms that drive the Mars rovers are ideal applications of goal-seeking AI. However, as the number of unique verbs required to achieve a specific goal increases, goal-seeking algorithms start to have problems. The other problem with these methods is that they are designed for boolean calculations; when the calculations become probabilistic, things go to hell very quickly.
I do retain some hope that multi-layered goal-seeking techniques can solve the problem, but as yet the definition of the layers remains for me an insurmountable obstacle. This is a reading activity, after all. My eyes must not be as good as yours — and I am using the retina iPad. Please allow zoom and pinch. Tiny serif font is brutal. There are so many free web fonts. Overlock is just gorgeous on the iPad, for instance.
Please take a look at. Playing the game requires an internet connection. Is that just for the sample stories? The game noticeably lags at times. Would this be due to Internet connection or yet-to-be optimized code? This may be a lag issue of a different sort. Would it be possible to have text read aloud? If authoring tools are eventually released, how will it be possible for a casual user to distribute stories from peer to peer — or must one actually get an app approved by Apple or subscribe to a Linden Research account for a fee shades of Adobe.
The first six points are for ease of use. The last point will likely exclude casual writers and may eliminate many educational uses. One is a generic description of what the PC will do, and the other is… talking in the language of system-level UI stuff. That seems imbalanced to me. I remember you talking about this during Phrontisterion.
Also looking forward to playing with the development tools, so if you need Beta testers let me know. Thanks for your comment on my blog. I checked out Versu and it is looking just like something I had in mind. I am very impressed. Makers of Second Life roll out storytelling games where users get paid to create 5 For Business. Makers of Second Life roll out two storytelling games where users get paid to create 5 For Business. Versu, la proposta di Linden Lab biroblu. Reblogged this on Cecily M and commented: Remembering Versu - Sibyl Moon Games.
You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. Twitter Facebook More Google. But the LA Times made it clear. There is no way you can be impartial regarding the political insult Trump — and his supporters — have inflicted on what used to be the United States of America. Alarmingly, there still are supporters. And let that General, when he faces the inevitable trial for Treason, plead self-defence….
Thursday June 15, 1: It is extremely rare to get such a condensed, detailed and articulate explanation of why a tragedy has occurred. What Pilgrim Tucker reveals is nothing less than criminal negligence at all levels of relevant authority. For the full horror, if you can, watch Newsnight here. The criminal prosecution which MUST follow will no doubt be fully funded.
The worst twist this tale could now take would be convincing evidence that a Moslem jihadi started the blaze either accidentally while trying to put together a bomb, or deliberately. Make damn sure you examine any such claims with forensic care, because if the authoritarians can focus on that angle, the appalling neglect of the welfare of the residents could be swept under the carpet.
Bomb or no bomb, that building should never have died like it did. Those political and corporate heads will, hopefully, roll, but even if they do, it will be far too little, far too late. Wednesday June 7, This vacuous nonsense represents a clear victory for the Terrorists. Their strategy is simple. They cannot take on an advanced western nation militarily so they need to encourage it to self destruct. By encouraging it to attack itself through increasing police state measures such as sweeping surveillance and restrictions on liberty and privacy.
As a consequence, the Police State of America is now in what we might call the early stages of its second civil war. Her kneejerk measures will, primarily, alienate the resident Moslem population and make it much easier for wannabe ISIS players to recruit assistance and much easier for existing recruits to hide in the community. All good conditions for feeding the fire. This stupidity should disqualify her from public office. Corbyn has at least grasped the connection between our foreign interventionism and home-grown terrorism.
Monday May 29, 5: We were talking — as many now are — about how in the world it was possible for 60 million Americans not just to vote for Trump, but, after days of demonstrated disaster and incompetence STILL to support him.
The other 6 in 7 are clearly impervious. Which made us wonder what would make the base desert him. Which took us onto the obvious and sinister parallel with Hitler. Or should I err on the side of caution and either fire up my VPN and the Iron incognito browser or Tor; one or two other reasonably secure browsers are available, but the VPN is essential before mounting such a provocative search?
Or just forget it altogether? Barely A Whimper and, as Edward Snowden put it, in the same article:. It goes further than many autocracies. Even friends of the Tories have long acknowledged its failure. And I have to say that a great deal of the blame for this sorry state of affairs lies in the hands of the British voter. In any other country, this would have prompted riots in the streets. Here it went down with barely a shrug. That itself has to be a legacy of the failure of popular protests in the recent past to have the slightest effect on the State.
Consider, for example the 2 million who marched against the Iraq War before the Blair government ignored popular opinion and collaborated with the Americans to assist the illegal invasion of Iraq.
Essays and reviews on narrative in games and new media
One of the many reasons that we opposed the Iraq invasion was that we strongly suspected that it would lead, inexorably, to precisely the kind of global chaos we are now witnessing and, occasionally, suffering. It is utterly mind-blowing that twats like Fallon still refuse to acknowledge the link between our growing catalogue of disastrous overseas interventions and the wave of European Terrorism mounted by disaffected jihadis.
That refusal to face the facts renders May and her party demonstrably unable to confront global terrorism. In that respect, Labour, or, at least, Corbyn, scores well because he does acknowledge the link between our foreign adventures and home-grown terrorism. If the answer is yes, whatever other merits they may have, they clearly cannot be trusted to protect your most important interests. Sunday September 4, 5: The normal mode of All Governments is to avoid disclosing any information which might be used against them while trying to appear as open and transparent as their citizens demand.
It can be defined thus:. The Accountability Theatre in that situation consists of the fact that, at no point, can any potential auditor either see the raw data without the consent and collaboration of its custodian, nor, even if permitted to see it, to verify that it is complete and unedited. The entire process, in other words, is based purely on faith that the State can do no wrong, a ship which sailed at least a century ago. What MPs are stuck with, regarding Parliamentary Expenses is a direct result of recognising that they cannot get away with the normal Accountability charade in respect of their expense claims.
Hence, for example, we know that both Jeremy Hunt and Amber Rudd each submitted claims of just 27 pence for two short car journeys. This level of disclosure is considered necessary so that the public can be convinced that proper scrutiny of expenses claims is taking place. And, frankly, it looks like they do a pretty good job. Through the demonstration the slave boy is able to show that he has true-belief though he cannot account for it. But, finally, and perhaps most importantly, the demonstration has also furnished us with a critical method of learning that can be applied in many educational contexts and could play a crucial role in any attempt to gain knowledge.
Book Download Free Guest Graphic Communications Djvu
Is it not four times as big? The diagonal slices the area of the 2-foot side square in half; if the area of the 2-foot side square is 4 feet then the triangle within it is 2 feet, given that it is half; if there are 4 x 2-foot triangles in the enclosed larger square EHFG then the enclosed square must be 4 x 2 feet, which is 8 feet; So, the area of the enclosed square EHFG is 8 feet, based on the diagonal of the 2-foot line figure. It provides strong motivation in uncertainty and encourages collective intelligence and collaborative effort. Have the children sit around a board in a horseshoe shape.
Set a problem with an answer such as a logical problem but follow this model. Provide a clue after a set number of goes but always try to find the clue in what has already been done by the others. Point out that the clue is not proof that the problem is solvable. It may be a red herring. Reasoning is like joining the dots. It is all about making connections, step by step, between different points in a chain to reach a conclusion. Sometimes, in order to establish a route, you need to know the starting point and the end point.
So, it can sometimes be logically fruitful to tell your class the answer but to withhold the reasons why it is the answer. Explaining the answer then becomes the task for the class and they have a clear end-point to navigate towards. To make things a little more challenging you could give them a choice of answers with the stipulation that they must justify the answer they choose. This is a process-orientated style of teaching rather than goal-orientated. Try the following puzzle in this way and see how the children deal with it much better than if you simply give them the problem, which will often leave them very confused.
Use this puzzle with the problem-solving procedure I described in an earlier issue of Teach Primary Vol. There are two brothers at the fork and you know that one of them always lies and the other always tells the truth. What single question could you ask them that will reveal the correct path to take? This knowledge will not come from teaching but from questioning. To transform your teaching try the following experiment for the next week.
Begin by adopting the following principle: This problem is solved if you place the inner-tube in water. It is as if the water examines the inner-tube for you. The process of questioning acts like the water revealing exactly where new information needs to be introduced but only where it is necessary to do so.
Teaching does not consist only in asking questions; at some point you will need to teach your students something. Just teaching, however, results in passive students; questioning engages students actively by requiring that they think in order to consider and then respond ; the dialogue that follows between the teacher and student builds their understanding.
So, clearly you want to maximise the thinking, the considering, the responding, the dialogue and therefore the understanding among your students. Adopting the principle of question maximisation will help to achieve this.
The point at which you can think of no further questions that you can ask until the student has some further information, is the natural point to introduce the information. But do so asking questions where you can and by introducing the relevant information step-by-step; followed, at each step, by a question to engage the student with the new information.
- Categories;
- Between East and West: From Singularity to Community (European Perspectives: A Series in Social Thought and Cultural Criticism).
- A place to exchange ideas about philosophy.
- No Paradox?
- 7 Secrets About What Men REALLY Want In a Relationship - How To Attract Single Sexy Guys That Want To Commit To YOU!.
Next time a student asks you a question ask yourself the following question: If you succeed, notice how much better they understand than if you had just told them. I think the collective noun is a ponder of philosophers. It will hopefully build some bridges between the different sections of philosophy education. We have people from the primary sector, secondary schools, university lecturers and professors, and philosophers in the media. There are footballers and Monty Python fans! And this whole event is about making more people aware of philosophy. Bizarrely, there is absolutely no rhyme or reason to this event that is all about reason.
The day is of course also about enabling kids from all backgrounds and ages to benefit from doing philosophy — and this has never been more important, since providing access to philosophy to youngsters is under threat even at university level. The critics say that we should focus on the foundational skills and not waste our time with new-fangled subjects.
Well, first of all, philosophy is hardly new-fangled but secondly and more importantly: What could be more foundational than concepts and reasoning? Understanding how things connect to one another and learning to critically evaluate what is presented? Reading, writing and arithmetic count for very little if children do not reason — if they do not think. So, deepening understanding through reasoning skills and habits will improve the 3 Rs not hinder them. The Cambridge Primary review, which came out last year, says as much: The reason the Cambridge review gave for this was that education does not deepen understanding; it teaches to the test.
The Philosophy Shop’s Blog
I would like to finish with a quote from the 16 th century writer Michel de Montaigne. I would like to have seen them teaching us our steps just by watching them without budging from our seats, like those teachers who seek to give instruction to our understanding without making it dance. Our sponsors and partners: Stephen Law for donating copies of his books The Philosophy Files. And finally, thanks to all of you who came to this fantastic event today.
Is philosophy relevant to the 21st Century? Repetition of stimulus and Task Question TQ: Echoing gives everyone time to think about the last comment, and to make sure everyone has heard it. Peter aids Carter and Luke in linking their ideas. Jack and Ellie — she asked him a really good question.
Clarification question used for Charlotte to understand atoms. Peter refocuses the question by quoting Charlotte more accurately than she did herself. Peter allows Charlotte to respond generally. Peter seeks the less frequent contributors this gets Luke to put up his hand. His objective is definitional. Discussion dries up in places due to the eristic dynamic. Honeycomb dynamic — each child responding directly to the adult, rather than each other no dialectic.
Grant shows some exasperation because he has an agenda and the children are perhaps not fulfilling his aim. Putting words in their mouths: He has to keep rephrasing his questions until a child responds. Children are no longer talking to each other but each one to him. These kids are particularly good at dealing with his questions but many other children would simply dry up under this pressure. Grant flicks from one idea to the next where the children are not sure of the rhetorical value of having done so e. Remember in a philosophy session to always go deeper: An emergent discussion — the children are deciding on the direction rather than the facilitator, the facilitator keeps the discussion within the realms of philosophy, and uses techniques to deepen thinking and reasoning.
I like speaking about what I think is right, but I also like finding out what other people think about it.
Philosophy is mainly all about thinking and I really like thinking because I think all the time. We do questions which are hard. It helps you understand the question and be more open-minded. I just like solving the questions. Trying to get the answer. I like when we finish the discussion and solve it and we have loads of different answers. It makes you think really deeply.
Anarchy in the UK: The discussion is rigged. Socrates has the answers from the outset, so he can lead the slave into giving the answers. Does the teacher need to know the answer? Tell the children that the problem may or may not be solvable. It is for them to decide. Emphasise that if they give up then no answers will be given by you: Make sure you that each attempt is witnessed by everybody in the room by drawing on the board for example.
Offer no advice but only tell them where they have broken the rules or stipulations. If they ask questions then direct them to the board to try it out. Make the clue as minimal as possible with as little explanation as possible for example simply point to an attempt that includes an important clue. Do not put anyone on the spot but try to choose people who have not yet had a go.