In My Small Corner (a journey between two faiths)

Nevertheless, despite all his greatness, he became involved in a terrible dispute with Moshe Rabbeinu that led to his death. He craved honor and could not bear to have a lower status than Elitzafan. He therefore embarked on a dispute with Moshe, with the goal of either becoming the leader of Kehas, or, as many suggest, becoming the Kohen Gadol see Tanchuma 10 and Rashi , It should be noted that even if a Kohen is not particular in observing the mitzvos, his blessings can still take effect since, as explained above, they were ultimately dependent on Hashem and not the Kohen Rambam , Hilchos Tefillah The wicks of the lamps on the left side of the Menorah had to lean to the right, toward the middle lamp, while the wicks of the lamps on the right side had to lean to the left.

Only the wick in the middle lamp remained perfectly central Rashi , according to Gur Aryeh. This demonstrated that they died because of their sins, and not because the food was in some way poisonous Emek HaNetziv. According to Ramban According to the Midrash, more people died as a result of the quails falling on their heads than from eating them Sifri.

The ones affected were the eirev rav and the animals and servants of Yisrael who camped on the outskirts of the camp Emek HaNetziv. If challah was not taken from the dough, it must be taken from the baked bread Rambam , Hilchos Bikkurim 8: Challah is taken only from bread made from one of the five grains — wheat, barley, oats, rye, and spelt ibid. This was the amount of mann eaten daily by each individual in the desert Shemos There is a dispute if nowadays challah is a Torah-mandated mitzvah as Rashi on He suggests that it is repeated here in order to clarify that he was an important person, yet to his eternal shame was drawn to rebel.

Alternatively, Tzeidah LaDerech suggests that by detailing his lineage, the Torah alludes to the reason for the dispute: Korach felt that he was the rightful heir to the leadership of Kehas, as will be explained shortly. The new hierarchy that came into existence with the rearrangement of the camp was based on merit individual and tribal , not lineage. See the overview in Parashas Bamidbar. As explained in the commentary on 8: Articles may be distributed to another person intact without prior permission.

We also encourage you to include this material in other publications, such as synagogue or school newsletters. However, we ask that you contact us beforehand for permission in advance at ohr ohr. Study in Israel Explore Judaism Audio. Beha'aloscha Kindling the Menorah Verses 8: Although we would not have expected him to do otherwise Sifsei Chachomim , the Torah specifically praises him here for the following reasons: Aharon did not modify the performance of the mitzvah in any way whatsoever Rashi ,8: Although some of the details of this mitzvah were surely not essential, Aharon did exactly as he was commanded, treating every detail as if it was indispensable Sifsei Chachomim.

He had no thoughts of personal greatness or honor on account of being the one chosen by Hashem to do it Ohr HaChaim ,8: Hashem decreed that the people would die off gradually, over a period of forty years, for a number of reasons: To live out their days. Forty years of wandering in the desert would give enough time for those aged twenty years to reach sixty before dying.

And indeed, no one younger than sixty ever died Rashi , This shows that Hashem had compassion on His children and wanted them all to live out a normal life span Sefer HaZikaron , It also explains how the spies had been able to travel the land in just forty days. Although He could have made it even shorter, He did not do so to allow those who were twenty years old to reach the age of sixty Gur Aryeh.

Nonetheless, for the children it would be a time of preparation.

It would be their schooling in faith, providing them with sufficient time to become permeated with the spirit of the Torah and to develop an immutable trust in Hashem. Mitzvos Related to the Land: Hashem taught this mitzvah to Bnei Yisrael immediately after the incident of the spies for the following reasons: As explained above, when the people heard that they would have to remain in the desert, they despaired of ever entering the land. Therefore, Hashem consoled them by teaching mitzvos that would apply only on entering Eretz Yisrael, assuring them that the nation would enter the land without a doubt.

The first mitzvah was libations, discussed above. The second was the mitzvah of challah Ramban , As discussed earlier comm. Not only does Hashem bless the people collectively by bringing rain and sunshine to nurture the crops producing the raw materials of flour, oil, and wine needed for libations , He also personally cares for each and every individual, ensuring that he receives his daily bread.

By separating challah before eating bread, the people would come to realize this. Korach was fabulously wealthy. He acquired his wealth back in Mitzrayim. Korach discovered one of them, and he became so rich that just carrying the keys to his treasure chests required countless donkeys Pesachim a; Maharsha , Sanhedrin a. The pursuit of honor. But surely I should have taken the next highest position. Korach was also jealous of Aharon Ramban. These feelings began burning inside him soon after the Mishkan was set up.

When did evil enter the human race, and with it human death? Moreover, believing in Adam and Eve as historical individuals is not necessarily at odds with all forms of evolution. An increasing number of Christians are advocating various accounts of how the creation of Adam and Eve might fit together with the existence of other hominids. Regardless of how all the details are interpreted and what harmonization with modern evolutionary theory may be required, Genesis 2—3 provides answers to some of the most important questions concerning our existence—including our awareness of right and wrong, our sense that something has gone terribly awry with the human race, and our recurring desire for redemption.

Its bold selectiveness is its great power. There are a number of testimonies to the reality of God within the natural order.

1. .
2. Why is Jerusalem important? You asked Google – here’s the answer | Opinion | The Guardian.
3. .
4. The Life of Isaac Newton (Canto original series).

It is perhaps the most basic and intuitive reason for believing the universe requires a Creator, and it can be broached by asking one of the most basic and important questions ever asked: Why is there something rather than nothing? The cosmological argument states essentially this: Modern cosmology has that the universe is not eternal nor absolute.

Space and time are relative and interdependent; the space—time universe is finite and contingent. In light of the kind of universe we seem to find ourselves in, the most obvious question to ask is simply this: Where did it all come from? According to standard Big Bang cosmology, the universe came into being out of nothing roughly 13 billion years ago. Before this event, there was absolutely nothing—not even empty space. When we try, we usually think of blackness or darkness, but blackness and darkness are each something—the opposites of light and color and whiteness.

It goes against every natural intuition we have—the very intuitions which drive the scientific enterprise. There must be a cause. If everything needs a cause, what caused God? Who designed the Designer? But this misses the point. The cosmological argument does not argue that everything needs a cause. It says that everything that begins to exist needs a cause. All finite, contingent reality needs a cause. God, by definition, is a different kind of reality—necessary and eternal and uncaused.

One can certainly deny that such a reality exists, but then the thing being denied is understood to be the uncaused Causer, the unmoved Mover. Whether the cosmological argument gets you to a personal Creator is less obvious. But it suggests there is some kind of cause, and it certainly opens the door to the possibility that this cause is a personal God.

After all, I would argue that it would be quite surprising if the cause of the universe were less than personal, beautiful, and intelligent, since the universe contains persons, beauty, and intelligence. Effect is generally not greater than the cause. One of the most interesting and open-minded perspectives on the intersection of science and faith was that of Albert Einstein. Einstein could be a called a kind of mystical Deist.

Let me explain what I mean by this. Einstein said several things that reveal this. To name just a few:. While he certainly rejected the idea of a personal God as this ulterior force, he did not do so on scientific grounds. You accept the historical existence of Jesus? No one can read the Gospels without feeling the actual presence of Jesus. His personality pulsates in every word. No myth is filled with such life. The problem involved is too vast for our limited minds. We are in the position of a little child entering a huge library filled with books in many languages.

The child knows someone must have written those books. It does not know how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of even the most intelligent human being toward God. The metaphor of a child in a vast library is indeed appropriate for our relation to God , given our smallness and frailty when compared to reality.

But the Bible claims there is more to be said about the whole matter. To pick up the metaphor, the Bible claims that the Librarian showed up, walked over to the child, and offered to explain the meaning of the books. According to the Bible, what is whispered and hinted at in the stars above is proclaimed in the life of Jesus of Nazareth.

There is a friendly Librarian walking around the library. Suppose for a moment that, at least hypothetically, something like God exists—an infinitely beautiful and loving Person who made the world. Where might this God reveal himself? Where on the grid might he show up? The Christian view is that God has hidden himself in our world.

In the Christian view, God did not come with pomp and parade, with accolades and audience. No, he arrived in a small, unimportant place—a dirty manger in a small village, to be precise. The God who made everything has come very close to us. The Highest One took the lowest place. He not only descended down into a manger but ultimately onto a shameful cross, dying in love for the forgiveness of our sins.

Perhaps as you read this article, you are struggling with doubts about faith. Maybe your doubts are related to scientific issues; maybe they are related to something more personal. Either way, here are a few pieces of advice. All doubts are based on some alternative faith. How do I know that proposition is true?

The Kohanim’s Blessings

Bring your doubts into the light and interrogate them, just as they are interrogating your faith. Let it be a fair fight. Many doubts that initially feel significant crumble on closer investigation of their hidden premises. Issues of doubt are never merely intellectual. In the Bible, faith and obedience are always connected.

Struggles of faith are often related to struggles of obedience, and struggles of obedience are often related to struggles of faith. Ask God to help you. Do your best to live in response to the light he has already given you, and he will show you the next step. The better question is: Where have you seen God already at work in your life?

Kindling the Menorah

What evidence do you already see of him? See your doubts in context, and then make an informed decision based on everything you see. I remember vividly what it felt like to struggle with doubt. In the throes of it, I had a breakthrough and wrote out the following in my journal. I go back to this passage again and again. I share it in the hope that it might help you:. Why does anything exist at all? This is the great mystery, says Wittgenstein.

Where did the universe come from? What is the Beginning which stands behind all other beginnings, the Reality which gives ground to all other realities? Unless theism is presupposed, all thought and action becomes absurd—without purpose and suspended over nothingness. Unless the infinite exists, the finite would never have come to be. What sense does the painting make unless there is paper on which it is drawn? God is the great truth; we are his dream.

Or, as our friend Albert Einstein put it: Copy the following code and paste it into your website's code to display this article on your site. Two modern origin stories are abiogenesis and Genesis. Can science and faith coexist?

Why is Jerusalem important? You asked Google – here’s the answer

James Choung explores the realms of religion and science and whether or not they are contradictory. Can a person believe in science and faith or are they mutually exclusive? Michael Frost explores how one affects the other. Does believing in science require just as much faith as religion? Corey Widmer explores how it takes faith not only to believe in God, but also to not believe in Him.

Can science disprove religion or vice-versa? See what others across the world have to say.

Sally Breen discusses her father's journey to find his purpose in life and the peace that came with embracing faith. Don't have an account? Forgot Password Reset Check your email for a link to change password. Haven't linked your account? Could science and faith be complementary? Take a look at what Christians think. For with much wisdom comes much sorrow; the more knowledge, the more grief. Like the fool, the wise too must die!

Has Science Replaced God? At the very end of his fascinating book A Brief History of Time , after outlining the search for a grand unified theory that explains the entire universe, Stephen Hawking says this: How Old Is the Universe? Evolution One of the focal points of debate concerning science and faith is the question of human origins.

Intelligent Design In fact, it is often claimed that intelligent design is not really science at all, but creationism in disguise. In his commentary on the book of Genesis, Derek Kidner makes the following observation: The Cosmological Argument There are a number of testimonies to the reality of God within the natural order.

A Deeper Look at the Christian View of Science and Faith

To name just a few: Do you believe in God? See your doubts in context. I share it in the hope that it might help you: Of course, this third alternative has many possible configurations. To put the relationship metaphorically, science and faith might be considered twin brothers fighting side by side in common aim, or two different alien species attempting to dialogue with each other, or an introvert and extravert complementing each other—and on and on we could go. This is why I suggest the third camp is the most interesting.

Enemies and strangers are relatively uniform relationships, but there are all different kinds of friendships. Science from the Latin word for knowledge, scientia can be defined as the study of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment. One of the common misconceptions in contemporary discussions of faith and reason is that religious people have faith while secular people do not. Two telling examples of human activities that require faith are reason and science.