I Do Solemnly Swear

Oath of office of the President of the United States - Wikipedia

Don't have an account? This chapter discusses the idea of a professional economic oath of ethics and whether such an oath exists. The chapter finds this lack interesting and explains in detail why this is so. Economics appears to operate on the presumption that the answer to the ethical questions that arise in economic practice are so obvious that they require no sustained attention.

The chapter concludes that the economics profession faces an obligation to examine the ethical substance of its practice. A properly specified professional economics ethics would improve conduct not through legislation but through careful attention to the complex responsibilities that attend the economist's influence.

Funpost! I do solemnly swear

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. I see the oath as having 3 important aspects. First, the employee swears to support and defend the Constitution against enemies.

• From Justice to Protection: A Proposal for Public Health Bioethics (SpringerBriefs in Public Health).
• Oath of office - Wikipedia?
• Frauen in der Bibel: Impulse für die Arbeit mit Kinder im Alter von 5 - 8 Jahren (Stufe II) (German Edition);
• A Vida após o divórcio - Começar de novo. (Portuguese Edition).

How does the oath manifest itself in day-to-day work? That question is far more complex than the oath itself.

Federal Government HR and Management News and Insight

Federal employees are required to follow lawful orders, even if they disagree with them. But what happens when an order violates a regulation or rule, but is not technically illegal? Because the appellant in this case contends that he disobeyed an order that would have required him to violate an agency rule or regulation, his claim falls outside of the scope of section b 9 D.

The oath of office does not grant any protection for deciding that an order is a bad idea, bad policy, or morally or ethically wrong. In fact, the oath does not grant any protection from anything. Robert Reich, a professor of public policy at the University of California, Berkeley, and a former Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration wrote: That occurs in two-bit dictatorships intent on stamping out dissent.

Further, the fifth amendment provides for equal protection under the law — about which Trump has barely given a cursory thought as he trundles out his threats and bombast. Mexicans also had better watch out and not just because of the wall.

• Abandoned Women: Scottish convicts exiled beyond the seas!
• 'I do solemnly swear': how will Trump uphold the constitution when he’s a threat to it?;
• Navigation menu.
• Come Thirsty Workbook: Receive What Your Soul Longs For.
• “I Do Solemnly Swear”!
• A Little Past Little Rock!

Those with Mexican heritage are likely to be abused for doing their job, as was the experience of federal judge Gonzalo Curiel who presided in civil litigation where Trump was a party. The then presumptive Republican nominee for president accused the judge of having a conflict, because of his ethnicity. Later, in , he said he was pro-choice, but got muddled and said he really meant to say he was pro-life. He also said he would appoint judges to the supreme court who would overturn Roe v Wade, the landmark decision that struck down state and federal laws restricting access to abortions, with the majority of the judges deeming abortion a fundamental right under the constitution.

• Der Totschläger (German Edition).
• Happy Mothers Day!?
• Captured by Calvary.
• The Empress of Australia: A Post-War Memoir?
• BAKED ALASKAN.