Slip Between The Wall
Prism Layers at Slip Wall to Non-Slip Wall Transition
Rouyer 1 , J. Goyon 1 , and P. Library subscriptions will be modified accordingly. This arrangement will initially last for two years, up to the end of The inset shows creep test data for the latter case. The numbers correspond to stress values in Pascals.
- Five Key Lessons from Top Money Managers.
- Test's Subscription Expires:.
- I Sat Where They Sat.
The dotted lines mark the transition to slip lower line and the bulk yielding upper line. Flow curve of a thixotropic clay-water suspension for fully rough solid stars and partially smooth open stars surface conditions. The insets show creep curves for rough top and smooth bottom surfaces. Hexagons show data with two rough plate surfaces. You do have the option to set a boundary to slip instead of wall, but I'm not sure about using UDF for that.
Wall Slip of Soft-Jammed Systems: A Generic Simple Shear Process.
Can you provide some additional information about what you are attempting to simulate? Are you by chance performing extrusion analysis? I want to simulate the flow of molten HDPE which exhibits slip between the fluid and the wall following a certain function depending on the wall shear stress. A simple BC won't do it for this type of BC since either slip or no slip are available as options and none of those satisfy the real behaviour close enough. If interested, you can take a look here: You need to be a member in order to leave a comment. In those cases, a flow field generated from a previous coarse no-slip calculation was required as an initial condition for the simulation to be stable.
Construction of filter-invariant wall-stress dynamic wall models 4. Slip length based dynamic wall models Ideally, we would like to construct a dynamic wall model of the form 2. However, the task is quite challenging due to the highly non-linear nature of the Navier— Stokes equations, and it is difficult to assess whether condition 2. Furthermore, this condition must hold for a broad range of equilibrium and non-equilibrium flow configurations of interest.
Instead, to make the problem tractable, we will evaluate models in Eq. The first case, C1, is computed using the slip length, lc1 , that supplies the correct mean stress at the wall. We proceed to evaluate the performance of different dynamic wall models using condi- tion 2. Starting from cases C1, C2 and C3, we compute the slip length m m m at the next time step, lc1 , lc2 , and lc3 , evaluated from all possible models in the family m 2.
After a search over all possible models complying with our constraints, Table 2 shows the coefficients ai corresponding to the best potential model, denoted by S-DWM. Wall stresses based dynamic wall models We apply the same procedure described above for the family of models given in Section 2. This condition was used to evaluate the requirement 2. C3 were rerun using this condition. A more exhaustive analysis of this family is deferred to future work.
This choice was necessary in order to include higher Reynolds number cases where the corresponding DNS was not available and the law of the wall is used instead. Restricting the error to be evaluated only in the log-layer is justified as wall models mainly impact the solution by vertically shifting the mean velocity profile and do not alter its shape for the range of grid resolutions tested see Figure 2a.
In particular, we measure error as " R 0. Figure 1 shows E as a function of grid resolution and Reynolds number. This is not surprising as the EQWM is calibrated to work well in channel flow settings. The slip lengths predicted by S-DWM are shown in Figure 2 b as a function of Reynolds number and grid resolution and compared to the optimal slip lengths Eq.
Create an account or sign in to comment
It is remarkable that S-DWM captures the overall behavior of the optimal slip lengths, that is, a strong dependence on grid resolution and a weak variation in Reynolds number. On the contrary, the test filter shape and SGS model highly impacted the prediction of the mean flow. Indeed, it was shown in Bae et al. This suggests that the family of models 2. TijSGS was computed as in Section 2.
All of the cases simulated yielded an imaginary slip length clipped to zero when solving Eq. Three-dimensional transient channel flow In order to assess the performance of S-DWM in non-equilibrium scenarios, we simulated a three-dimensional transient channel flow Moin et al.
A plane channel flow simulation was modified to incorporate a lateral transverse pressure gradient 10 times that of the streamwise pressure gradient. The resulting flow is one with strong transverse acceleration during the initial transient. Details of the simulations are given in Section 3. The evolution of streamwise and spanwise wall stress as a function of time is shown in Figure 3.
No-slip condition
The results show that the NEQWM provides the best prediction for the evolution of the spanwise wall stress, although the results from the other models are comparable. We have presented two families of dynamic models based on the invariance of the wall stress under test filtering. The models are effectively applied through a slip boundary condition with the associated slip length l.
We have devised the coupling between wall models and LES as a stable dynamical system that must provide the correct wall stress at the statistically steady equilibrium.