Les Histoires de Macathy: Robin et la bombe  (- SDE) (French Edition)

They have large numbers of defenders, collaborators, and so on. Since Webb doesn't even understand my point, I'd suggest his book is not worth reading. As I think I have already explained, dynamite was not relatively new and had been around for almost fifty years at the time of the suffragette bombings.

The idea that Victorian women would use nitro-glycerine was not at all absurd; they had the services of an analytical chemist called Edwy Clayton, who subsequently appeared at the Old Bailey. Rather than being a Jew, he came from a Methodist background. It is of course perfectly true that Stolypin was assassinated in by a Jewish anarchist called Dmitry Bogrov, but this tells us little about anarchists in general. None of those arrested in this country for terrorism in the late nineteenth century were Jews. It is also true that some churches may well have been destroyed by Jews in other parts of the world.

Those which were set fire to and bombed in Britain between and were invariably targeted by suffragettes and not Jews. Alice Wheeldon, for example, was responsible for the burning down of the church at Breadsall on 5 June , Annie Bell detonated the bomb at the Metropolitan Tabernacle in London on 10 May and so on. Neither Wheeldon nor Bell were Jews. I'm not at all sure why Mr West seems to believe that there is no evidence that suffragettes carried out violent attacks.

There is no shortage at all of evidence for this. The bomb itself was planted by Emily Davison, who later threw herself in front of the King's horse at Epsom. If there is any evidence that Jews were responsible for any of these attacks, then of course it would be interesting to see it. Unfortunately, Mr West appears to have something of a bee in his bonnet about Jews and thinks them responsible for many of the world's ills.

In this particular case he is mistaken, although any evidence which he wished to produce in support of this hypothesis would be welcomed. The fact that some Jews were in favour of the Russo-Japanese War of tells us little about who planted bombs in Britain between and Looking through Mr West's reviews of other books on Amazon reveals a common thread; he nearly always mentions Jews.

Spending a lot of time hunched over a keyboard in a darkened room, writing about the Jews is bound to give anybody a distorted view of the world and it is to be hoped that some friend of Mr West's might have a quiet word with him and encourage him to get out more and find another hobby; preferably one which does not involve Jews!

I don't care much for Webb's dishonest points here. Any serious historian knows Jews murdered tens of millions of Russians, after the Federal Reserve in put them in the position to dominate the USA economically, which of course Bernard Baruch did. If Webb thinks mass murder is a matter of having bees in bonnets, I'd recommend he either seeks psychiatric help or volunteers for investigation by psychologists.

However all this is somewhat of a waste of time; the hypothesis of Jewish involvement is an obvious one and any serious historian ought to examine it. Obviously it's unlikely the evidence will be freely available. Clearly I was confusing Webb with someone with a serious interest in the past and future. Perhaps he should find a new hobby appropriate to his skill level. The problem here is really a simple failure of logic. Even if it were to be true that tens of millions of Russians had been murdered by Jews, this would shed no light at all on either suffragette terrorism or the anarchist movement in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.

Mr West's thought process seems to be as follows. Some anarchists, such as the man who assassinated Russian Prime Minister Pyotr Stolypin, were Jews; therefore anarchism was an eastern European, Jewish plot. This is why it is suggested that anarchists is a 'code-word for Jews from eastern Europe'.

Of course, the great majority of anarchists were not Jews from eastern Europe at all; many of them were Italians from Catholic families. One might as well describe anarchists as being a code-word for Catholics from southern Europe. In fact many of the most famous anarchist bombers such as Ravachol and Emile Henry were French atheists.

Perhaps we should say that 'anarchists' is a code-word for atheists from western Europe! Unfortunately, Mr West sees almost everything from the perspective of Jewish conspiracies. Whether we are talking about anarchist and suffragette terrorism, world wars and economic crises or immigration and mixed marriages, there is one solution; it's those pesky Jews, at it again! Unless, and until, we are given some solid evidence to consider, I think that we may safely dismiss this particular hypothesis.

Mr West has here a public platform to show us why he thinks that it was the Jews, rather than the suffragettes, who bombed Lloyd George's house and also why he believes anarchism in the early twentieth century to be a Jewish plot. Until he does so, his ideas on the subject are best described as 'bare assertion'.

Unfortunately Webb is too ignorant to face the issue, as his mass of irreleventsia shows. And unfortunately it's therefore clear his book is worthless. We are, alas, destined never to learn what grounds anybody would have for supposing that Jews were running around planting bombs in Edwardian Britain. This is a pity, because there is something quite entertaining about the idea of sinister rabbis fooling about with sticks of dynamite! Mr West is apparently a sensitive soul and I have inadvertently put him out of countenance.

It is to be hoped that he changes his mind and tells us a little more about this hypothesis.

• Les Histoires de Macathy: Robin et la bombe (- SDE) (French Edition).
• !
• Pick Up?
• .
• Patience (The Fruit of the Spirit).
• .

History can be a rather dry topic sometimes and many of us would welcome a lighthearted diversion of this sort. Webb, I agree that any allegations of Jewish involvement must be supported by evidence. So far, what Rerevisionist says in this matter remains an interesting hypothesis, nothing more. That said, you must of course know that when Rerevisionist refers to Jews in this context, he is not or at least, not primarily referring to 'rabbis'.

That you would characterise the supposition in this way is, perhaps, telling. Thanks for your comment. I'm in fact grateful to Mr Webb, though he may be surprised to hear it. It simply hadn't occurred to me before that it's extremely unlikely that suffragettes would have started bombing campaigns; after all, the whole point of parliament is to debate and discuss things, and suffragettes were wealthy enough to print 'literature' and make speeches.

And of course Jews in Russia, Germany, and for that matter the east end of London were aggressive and violent and now known to have been prime movers in the disasters of the 20th century. I don't know Mr Webb's working methods: Note the omission of the USSR. The authorities had unearthed a network of contacts in the armed forces. With every copy of War Commentary sent to a serving soldier, a monthly newsletter was enclosed. John Olday, a talented refugee from Nazi Germany, produced it.

He had established a network of contacts, mainly during his two years in the Pioneer Corps. Attractively produced and illustrated, the monthly newsletter strived to articulate many grievances of the armed forces and promote action against them. Soldiers councils needed to be created. Alongside this there was a plethora of pamphlets, including one entitled The Wilhelmshaven Revolt.

It gave an exciting account of the mutiny of the German navy that sparked off the German Revolution of [i. Jewish 'Communist' Revolution that failed]. Describing those stirring events, his message was quite simple: Even those who remained loyal to the capitalist system would be overwhelmingly workers. Americans were made to understand Their [Russian Jews'] modus operandi relying upon the state to extract the maximum surplus value—was incompatible with the American method of relying upon giant corporations to extend US influence.

Here's ' Torgo ' in YouTube comments, 10 Dec And stabbed Poland in the back by encouraging them to fight Germany in and then turning them over to Stalin at the end of the slaughter. And declared war on Germany but not the Soviet Union in before Germany declared war on them. And on and on and on Britain really screwed up the world through their rothschild scum, their helping turkey in the crimea against russia, messing with spain, poland, germany, their messing with the boers, their meddling in america, etc etc.

The world has been completely dominated by Jewish tyranny disguised as British Imperialism. Most British people including me until some years ago had no idea of this. In reality he is the biggest traitor England has ever known, even worse than these puppet PM's. He owes a debt to the state as well as to his ancestors and descendants. He was brought up under its protection, induced to obey its laws, taught to rely on its justice and endowed with a share of its fame.

Only the stateless know what it is to have no national legend, pride, or flag. Note, five years later: Emerging from the murk, it seems clear Cromwell was a tool of Jews, who wanted to enter Britain, to start their Bank and exploit England, Ireland, and the New World. But Jews may have wondered about opposition from the landed and traditionally rather warlike aristocracy. Could these 'debates' have been set up as a divide-and-rule strategy? It seems likely enough. At this time I happen not to have access to my books, so I leave the question here.

This site sells 2 DVDs: Film 1 The Story of the Debates Extracts from the play are intercut with comments from historians: Robertson introduced the book being reviewed; see notes below on his money-making legal scheme. Billy Bragg is a sort of zero-intellect folk-joke singer.

Chakrabarti is one of many rented foreigners, paid as she long as she remembers what lies she has to tell. All this certainly adds weight to the idea that 'democracy' was a fake, foisted on England in a way designed to support Jewish crime. To this day it appears to be defended by a corps of liars and collaborators. All this may help people decipher what such outfits as Common Purpose mean by the 'post-democratic era'. Youtube 10 Jan Cromwell certainly tried his best to let the Jews back in, But the English parliament of the time rejected it.

Those were the 'Jews' Cromwell was paid by. And then London burned down. Possible connection with the 'Great Fire' and the later Bank of England. The government of a modern industrial state, backed by the police, the army, the media of communication, wields powers undreamed of one-hundred years ago. The abuse of these powers by political opportunists, gangsters, psychopaths and authoritarian cliques pose a far more serious threat to society than the ordinary criminal.

This book is a pioneering attempt to apply the methods of criminology to the 'criminals in office'. It raises and answers a number of vitally important questions Alex Comfort on Crime: Crime is the deliberate violation of a provision which the law upholds by threat of punishment. Alex Comfort on Delinquency: There is an analogous ineducability in government, among the advocates of 'strong' policies. Comfort on 'Types of Leadership' and 'Aberrant Personalities': The idea of the 'collaborator' as a wartime phenomenon has no basis in fact—collaboration, in the derogatory sense, may originate in a masochistic delight in defeat, but a large part of it is the wartime counterpart of the normal executive status' [p 42] ' Operatic attitudes such as 'unconditional surrender' or 'massive retaliations', derived from exhibitionist leaders, supersede intelligent thought.

Problems can be shelved and replaced by action or by appropriate gestures. The genuine fear and hatred of war under these conditions cannot hide its satisfactions. This ambivalence makes the threat of war and the promise of war two of the most important political forces of our time. It is essentially the socially maladjusted civilian who is happiest in wartime—his problems are shelved The adjusted individual finds his entire life disorganized Neither the German exterminations of Jews, nor the Allied massacre of enemy civilian populations, Public sentiment against war is and was traditionally strong in Britain and America, and was by no means absent in Germany.

A marked exception was the forcing of war upon the British Government in by a spontaneous public reaction, [after] widespread suspicion of complicity between British right wing thought and Nazi ideology. The replacement of Hitler by another less paranoid leader There is documentary evidence relating most of the calculated and indiscriminate war crimes to the invention and planning of individual psychopaths in office.

Nick Griffin on the way the BBC mispresents serious news. Ernest Robert Trattner , Architects of Ideas: Harrap London, Sydney, Bombay, Toronto. I have a copy of this book, published in , and was surprised to find the author lived in the USA. I was unsurprised to see him described as a 'Rabbi'; his other books were on the Bible and related subjects. My interest in this book was to check how much of it was intended to stake the claim of Jews in having developed 'ideas', in this case mostly the technological side of science, without much philosophy, pure science, or social science.

Trattner seems to have published Understanding the Talmud in , and this may be available online. It is of course unlikely to be honest. Jews had been quietly occupying the English-speaking countries, including Canada, South Africa, Australia and smaller countries. Their aim presumably was to claim invention of ideas and institutions which were generally agreed to be civilised, apart from aesthetic production. Trattner's ideas is at least partly in this mould, and hunters of Jewish invasions will probably find this book worthwhile reading.

The bibliography is mostly of books from , though there are many 19th century books; I say books, because there no papers I think , though there are a few individual book chapters. The index is of names only, which saves enormous effort in trying to categorise theories. The 15 principal chapters plus my abbreviations are: Chamberlin who was he? I'm not as I type in the mood to investigate, but at least Trattner makes efforts to present views he presumably dislikes, mentioning Gobineau and Chamberlain, for example, in his Boas chapter. His chapter on Marx makes no attempt to explain what ideas, if any, Marx genuinely held; it's entirely conventional and unhelpful, glossing over Marx's actual reactionary deeds.

And 'In recent years, a worldwide tidal wave of race consciousness, ill-founded and preposterous, has engulfed humanity Trattner on relativity is the usual pitiful melange of light, railway train motions, space and time, curved surfaces. I couldn't find any presaging of 'nuclear weapons'; perhaps the world was not deemed ready for such a fraud.

Anyway—some readers might find the book useful in exploring the roots of Jewish deception in the first half of the 20th century. Private channel between Churchill and Roosevelt. I found the site of Jorma Jormakka, which includes a good piece on the plague.

It's backed up here in case it vanishes or moves. I recommend the original be consulted in case it's amended. Note Castle Street to its east. Golden Square was one of John Hunter's residences; the other was in Earl's Court off the map, to the west. A few churchyards are included in the map. Begins experiment on venereal diseases, perhaps on himself - Appointed surgeon at St George's.

Portrait of John Hunter hanging at the Royal Society. The artist, Robert Home, was his wife's brother, and brother of Everard Home. The dog may be Lion , his wolf-dog hybrid. Then click on the menu left pane to choose reviews right pane. Click for collections below: Elfish Gene Alan Bennett: Untold Stories Craig Brown: Man of the Month Gee: Ice People Jacqueline Gold: Three Men Ann Oakley: Corridors of Power Rendell: Road Rage A N Wilson: Impact of the Computer Revolution Peter Large: The Micro Revolution Brown: Laws of Form G. Theory of Numbers H.

Science Since Trattner: Architects of Ideas Wendy Moore: On Growth and Form S Roberts: Measurement Systems Lancelot Hogben: Discovery of Anaesthesia Holmyard, Partington: Surely You're Joking, Mr. General Chemistry Aleksandr Romanovich Lurie: An Introduction to Neuropsychology D. The Zinc Solution James Bruges: Jodrell Bank Patrick Moore: Children of A Bomb Harold Hillman: Living Cell Wendy Moore: Nuclear Illusion Petr Skrabanek: Follies in Medicine Ellison: Nuclear Barons Bjorn Lomborg: Architects of Ideas Wilson: The Party System Melvyn Bragg: Twelve Books Richard Branson: Business Stripped Bare Yvonne Burgess: America's Quest for Global Dominance Dalrymple: In Praise of Prejudice Dalrymple: The God that Failed Hamilton-Paterson: Empire of the Clouds Mark Jones: Art of Deception David C.

Ethics C N Parkinson: East and West John Pilger: Distant Voices Madsen Pirie: Pan Principle Simon Singh: Outline of History Wells: Complete Short Stories Wells: National Government Tom Reilly: Strange Death of Liberal England Hobsbawm: War Between the Generals Peter James: Centuries of Darkness Peter James: Luddite Revolt Gerrard Winstanley Hensman: Rich Against Poor Buchanan: Churchill, Hitler, Unnecessary War Allen: Buddha and India's Lost Religion Wood: Marco Polo C N Parkinson: Hoax of the 20th Century Bradley Smith: Holocaust Revisionist Metapedia John Bean: Blood in the Square Cobain: Babylonian Woe Richard Branson: Business Stripped Bare Eamonn Fingleton: Hard Industries Freakonomics Hensman: Who Makes Our Money?

Rich Dad, Poor Dad Manser: Britain in Balance Dambisa Mboyo: The Law and the Profits Robert Peston: Policing Four Nations Colin Flaherty: White Girl Bleed a Lot Cawthorne: Massacres by Gunmen McLagan: Herd in peace and war Bernays: Games People Play Raymond Cattell: Battle for the Mind Andreski: Psychology Exposed Derren Brown: Mind Tricks Derren Brown: Houdini on Deception Noam Chomsky: How Children Fail R. Why Johnny Can't Think Ed. Corruption of the Curriculum Pullan: University of Manchester, Mabbott: Jane Austen J Robinson: Climate Change Bibi van der Zee: Rape Mother Teresa Esther Vilar: The Manipulated Man Webb: Suffragette Terrorism Ann Oakley: The Great Illusion Raymond Challinor: Sleepwalkers 'George Orwell': Stalin's War of Extermination, James Bacque: German Civilians Laurence Rees: The 'Final Solution' David Irving: Churchill's War part 2 Bertrand Russell: Disarming Iraq Kate Hudson: Manual of Historical Literature Jad Adams: Victorian wars Conrad Russell: Myth of Rome's Fall Arthur Kemp: Joseph Needham and China Thomas Pakenham: Short History of the Future Thomas E.

Myth of Asia Edgar Wilson: Myth of the British Monarchy J. Fish and Chips Owen Wister: Jolly Green Giant A. Alastair Campbell Alex Comfort: Life and Loves Hitler: Homer Lane Wendy Moore: John Hunter Bryan Magee: A Life Oswald Mosley: My Father, Bertrand Russell Holroyd: George Bernard Shaw Holroyd: Bernard Shaw, John Tyndall: Call for British Rebirth Ron Shoesmith: Utopia on Trial Newman: A Valley in Italy Alfred Watkins: She referred to a famine monument, and said "Mmmmm—it was something to do with religion".

Victors not only write history, but shape historical perceptions and monuments. English Heritage Members' Magazine illustrates the process. It's published by Immediate Media Co. About ten of their workers are listed, with titles of the capitalised Editor, Director, and Manager type. We also have about eight contributors, some of whom are credited with assembling the longer articles. And there are six names, 'For English Heritage'. And a registered company, It appears not to be heavily advertised, sharing in the general decline of printed news.

For my taste, the magazine is purged of financial content: Their brief seems to be mostly buildings, or parts of buildings, and what might be referred to unkindly as ruins, though these appear to include Stonehenge—something of a fake, now—and other important sites. The National Trust seems to be mainly imposing buildings, and, in view of the colossal subsidies to some landowners, there is some suspicion of advantageous secretive deals.

My principal dislike is what might be called the overwhelmingly 'politically correct' content, doing nothing to promote public knowledge. I'll give here an expandable list of problems: Another is a struggle for wall-mounted blue plaques, for blacks and Asians! And there's a constant wariness of immigrants, invaded by invitation of Jews, who seem to have little interest in English or any other history. Evidence of the two Empires including North America is barely mentioned. Nothing much of shipbuilders, navigators, sailors who once spent their lives sailing around the world.

Many industrial revolution sites Wigan Pier, anyone? In the issue I have in front of me, Cuthbert of an Anglo-Saxon monastery, or perhaps later a Priory, seems to have been demoted and then promoted. Hints of how Jewish scribblings were made a power bloc are missing. Doesn't do justice to the site's important and tragic history.. It's best known for an influx of Jews, but not best known for the reasons.

It is now known that Germans were tortured in 'the cage' in London; Hess was jailed and killed; a few Britons were imprisoned under Section 18B; propaganda was printed, filmed, and broadcast. Foreigners were blockaded; and so on. Sites may remain which could be made suitable for visitors. But the presentation of such houses is in the style of romantic novels.

Anyway, more in sorrow than anger I wonder if a time will ever come when true English history is on open display? It's a straightforward parroting of the usual rubbish. Marx is now known to have been part of the super-rich industrialist group. Here's a good piece on Marx mileswmathis. A house in London had a blue plaque as far back as It's irritating to find barefaced lies repeated in so-called English Heritage.

I looked at July 's issue; even with padding the magazine gets ever-thinner.

Catherine Sauret

It has 6 pages on films partly show in 'historic sites', including Victoria and Abdul, Wonder Woman, Avengers: And 4 pages on another film, Dunkirk , more trash. There's a page on 'Shakespeare's Birthplace'. It's all very sad. But the long-established English tradition, if it can be called that, telling lies about so-called 'Jews', is maintained.

In the past, there were more of such people per thousand. During mediaeval times, for example, one imagines an artist with his atelier, and underlings grinding pigments, stretching canvases, and painting boring background bits. Televisually interesting subjects are possibly rather rare: The industrialised world's food has changed to what seems a fantastic extent, though of course the nutritional basis is more or less the same.

Consider the attractive stone octagonal kitchen at Glastonbury Abbey, with a fireplace in four corners. Probably this mostly cooked meat and bread potatoes hadn't been discovered; nor had maize. Herbs and spices, and sugar, and edible oil, usually come from plants in hot climates, because they have spare energy to make by-products. There were onions, but not tomatoes. A modern time-traveller might have been reminded of Ray Kroc's establishment, 'MacDonalds'. By , root vegetables supported cattle over winter; potatoes supported people throughout the year; ships and railways routinely carried food; refrigeration had been invented; vacuum-sealed canisters, airtight tins and jars were mass-produced; electric cooking was added to gas cooking.

Peasants, in Britain, growing and preserving and cooking their own food, were as obsolete as hand-loom weavers. The stage was set for professionalisation of cookery, though not really in Britain—warmer climates were better adapted to food designed to be attractive, France being a prominent example, with several hundred local types of cheese, and several hundred types of wine. To this day Michelin—a guidebook started in by a tyre company—awards stars which rule part of the emotional lives of chefs, with 3 stars the maximum, which seems appropriate for Ramsay's book.

H G Wells wrote a short story A Misunderstood Artist , possibly suggested by Escoffier at the Savoy, with hints of playful experimentation. Passing over rural inns, urban chop houses, the Lyons Corner House phenomenon and the Aerated Bread Company, fish and chips , proprietary relishes 'Gentleman's Relish' for example and pastes and chocolate bars, Evelyn Waugh promoting foreign food, and a few dozen wars, we arrive at , Ramsay's year of birth.

Are You an Author?

There's a lot of 'human interest' here, including his father, who appears to have been a derivative pop impersonator—a product of TV and electronic media, someone who never saw the original performer. And a brother who became a drug addict, though I don't think the supplier chain is identified. A word to people in similar circumstances: They make up 'news' anyway. I won't bother with these details, or Ramsay's ambition to take up football—one of the secrets of football is that many footballers become crippled.

It's a bit disappointing to find Ramsay regards a council house upbringing as an embarrassment, as, it seems, did Pierre Marco White, under whom he worked for a time. I wonder if earlier British socialists would have been annoyed. Chefs, judging by Ramsay, don't seem to have a high opinion of each other, except when, like actors, they have a motive for luvviness. Quite a few conflicts are listed, and some omissions: Ramsay owned 3, cookbooks not the British 'cookery books'. His favourite is Nigel Slater. One might have thought the leading chefs could have a reunion every year or two, for example, and exchange anecdotes about the poor quality and unreasonableness of their diners.

Maybe their wives could cook, to reduce competitive problems Ramsay says interesting things en passant about the employees and lower orders who must numerically dominate the fine eating industry. For example he worked on Reg Grundy's private yacht in the British Virgin Islands, and recounts how some of the staff got the idea it was their yacht, and behaved inappropriately, rather in the way I gather that roadies with pop groups behave. Ramsay says, convincingly, that most of his staff stayed with him, though he sacked some who presumably couldn't take the pace or the required skill-levels.

Ramsay is remarkably low on technical details of cooking: And surely there must be valuable rules of thumb, or physics laws, to help cook? Watching some Hell's Kitchens would-be chefs not even able to cook risotto "riz-odo" in American suggests there's a need for helpful mnemonics. Surely there must be facts on transmission of heat, temperatures to get proteins cooked, measures of chewability of foods, effects of marinades, the ageing of wines, the effects of microwaves, the mixing of flavours?

What does Sous Vide cooking in clear plastic do? Is liquid nitrogen useful? Can rum be injected by hypodermic into mince pies? Is papaya the best enzyme for softening meat? Another apparent omission—I may be wrong here—is the economics of the top of the restaurant market. Ramsay's writings feel a bit like flowers, evolved to exude nectar, and expecting to be rewarded with the arrival of bees.

Ramsay the feeling about New York that it's terrifically rich, but surely there must be some uncertainty—Jew-promoted non-whites everywhere, for example. I can remember being shocked at the small number of Americans who bought hardback books. Yet another omission is detail on the use of illegals in restaurants, sandwich-making places, etc. For example, I noticed an article about 'Sanctuary Restaurants' after Trump's election ; and, twenty years ago, a sandwich seller cheerfully admitting most of his workers were illegal 'immigrants'. I wonder if part of the intention behind TV chef programmes is to scrub up the image of restaurants.

The final chapter, inserted into the edition, reads like Ingvar Kamprad 's biography: Looking back, I can't really tell how successful he was. Gordon Ramsay Holdings, an Internet search or two reveals, had liabilities in mid listed as 36 million sterling, though I'd guess his TV appearance fees may be held in a different account. He adds a description of a Christmas visit to Helmand in Afghanistan 'in conjunction with the Ministry of Defence and the Daily Mirror'.

He describes year old soldiers as 'ready, focused, and just incredibly disciplined', with 'Christmas treat donated by Philip Green of Top Shop and BHS fame'. Philip Green attained subsequent fame as something like a Jewish pension-fund thief from what was British Home Stores. He says 'Trust me, there were no special arrangements.

Out there, it doesn't matter a fuck who you are'—as though Jew financiers and their political puppets are there all the time. Clearly, revisionist thinking is not a part of his mental equipment. He thinks National Service should be re-introduced. On his return, in aged 40, he was part of a star-studded party 'in the Banqueting House, Whitehall'. One of Gordon Ramsay's achievements along with Ozzy Osbourne must be included weakening of the image of the British as shy, retiring, and polite. I could find nothing on 'Kosher' food, or the Kosher scam imposed on Americans and others.

Probably the US critics would prefer to redirect diners to something like Solly's maximum torture K salt beef n bagels shack. Anyway, his New York restaurant has closed. It occurred to me that possibly Ramsay thinks he's a 'Jew'; Ramsay is listed as a Jewish surname. At the time he wrote, he'd been contracted to do the British TV Hell's Kitchen , 'one of the worst experiences of my life'. The US version, in a converted LA warehouse, started in about , and is still going. The difference was they had applicants who were not well-known, and with some cooking experience, and who wanted to run their own places.

Kitchen Nightmares postdates this book, and shows that there can be such a thing as bad publicity. A majority closed, not in my view surprisingly. There's a significant point here, relevant to the present-day Jewish censorship: Ramsay's handlers are careful never to let this show, just as there is no reference to 'Kosher' practices. And this applies to this book. OK to insult other chefs; taboo to tell truths Jews think are bad publicity. Gordon Ramsay doesn't speculate much on public perception of these restaurants: It might be fun to watch other people in a restaurant being served food contrary to expectations: This was before television; and before radio and cinema.

Before colour photographs, refrigeration, telephones. Before commercial electric light; gas lights were at that time leading-edge recent inventions. No motor-cars; London had many horse-drawn cabs, and of course horses needed such things as livery stables and horse tack and food and shoes—and disposal facilities.

Flying machines were widely believed to be an impossibility. Jacobs, and Jack London, were a vast global haulage industry. A threat to British sea power was 'unthinkable'. Cheap paper was being engineered; of the results, 'Tit-Bits' existed, with 'Comic Cuts' soon about to come. It would be more than 60 years before the habit of 'watching' television, for four or five hours an evening, dulled the wits of masses of people.

The railways were then the fastest-ever inland travel system. They led to railway inns near stations, access even to small villages, the growth of seaside resorts, J. Smith's railway station bookstalls. And to worries about where the hell am I: J's Waterloo station has a joke bribe to an engine driver for reassurance.

Or so the publisher thought: But J says nothing about high status people: Or company promoters for African mines. But there's nothing at all. Jerome left school at 14 and no doubt was overawed. Three Men in a Boat was written when he was twice that age. Operettas are a close equivalent to Three Men in a Boat: Three Men in a Boat dodges much of the technical problem of precise description by personifying nature: Here's a longer, impressive, extract from such a passage: The three men are J himself, George the bank clerk, Harris, and a noisy fox terrier named Montmorency.

I've just read that Keith Richards calls his dog 'syphilis'—Five men and a disease? J's main narrative device is speech: His internalised speech mostly recounts irritations between the men as they wrestle emotionally with each other and with an indifferent universe. All these digressions are suited to reading aloud: I'm surprised how little description J puts into his book.

The dog, and Harris's blazer, are described in greater detail than any of the three men. Harris's twelve stone is regarded as 'big'; this may be a comment on the unindustrialised diet of the times. Possibly the paucity of description is related to J's early educational terminus: There's quite a contrast with say Jack London's highly-detailed accounts of physiologies and physiognomies.

The clue may be in Idle Thoughts of an Idle Fellow , published a few years earlier, which contains many similar situations to Three Men in a Boat , but all expressed in the form of autobiographical meditational monologues. Wrapping these thoughts but not those on poverty and pawn-shops with bodily forms undeniably expands into a more appealing package. Jerome, confident that emotions are similar between types of people, liked colloquial speech: Here's an example of a whole cluster of short popular phrases: Not, I explained, upon my own account. I was never queer.

But I was afraid for George. George said he should be all right, and would rather like it, but he would advise Harris and me not to think of it, as he felt sure we should both be ill. Harris said that, to himself, it was always a mystery how people managed to get sick at sea Perhaps these things are intrinsically one-off and isolated, like the song A Whiter Shade of Pale. Could this be autobiographical? The author of the world's best ever autobiography could not, one imagines, ever write another one. I scribbled down some English novels: Day's History of Sandford and Merton ish ; Valentine Vox Cockton, ish ; Mrs Caudle's Curtain Lectures Jerrold, ish ; Tom Brown's Schooldays ; Erewhon Butler; ; Diary of a Nobody Grossmiths, ; maybe Zuleika Dobson Beerbohm, and other later works, but didn't find compelling lessons apart from avoiding unpleasant topics, and allowing titillating but not dangerous exploits.

Let me return to Britain, and the then-current events—which may well have led many readers to seek escapism. Here are a few items: Underground trains in London after an earlier start expanded c. In were the 'Whitechapel Murders'—foreshadowing today, where murders of whites are ignored by the media. There's nothing of this in Jerome, though there is a drowned single mother story. The 'Aliens Act' was The Thames note for Americans: Westminster and Hyde Park, the City of London and London Bridge, and east to Whitechapel, Stepney, Rotherhithe docks, Deptford, Greenwich, Woolwich and further to the sea—flanked by many rural-sounding placenames—are redolent of the tougher businesslike history of Britain.

From its source, the river, called the Isis, is much narrower, and very winding: Britain was one of the first industrialised countries, but Jerome, writing his book in a Victorian summer, overlooking London, preferred to write of rural scenes and situations. I'd guess he used maps and guidebooks to fill out the detail. Jerome opens his book with a long passage of rather absurd exaggeration about more-or-less imaginary illnesses one is 'general disinclination to work' of the three men.

These turn into the motive for their river jaunt. If you like that scene-setting, you'll probably like the rest of the book. At the finale, exeunt the three, muddy and dishevelled after several days of rain, going to the Alhambra, Leicester Square—mistaken for the 'contortionists from the Himalaya Mountains'. The pace is slow: Windsor, Runnymede, Magna Carta island, Maidenhead and Marlow, are some of the places visited or rowed past. Jerome omitted Eton, true to form, though his route must have passed close.

Much of the scenery is still identifiable: Chapter 11 includes a memorable three-age-or-so section 'specially inserted for schools' on Magna Charta his spelling and 'the cup of liberty', at an island at Runnymede in John we are told died a year later, having ravaged England, and then absolved by Pope Innocent. Jerome sounds something like Walter Scott; I don't know the sources he must have pored over, but a charter of liberties sounds good, and the deeper realities, such as Edward I's expulsion of Jews 75 years later, and Norman barons and resentful Saxons, are not part of Jerome's purpose; any more than they are now, in semi-official guidebooks and Pitkin glossy colour brochures.

A few other historical events appear in Jerome, reflecting published views of the time: Caesar and Cassivelaunus, approved for the operational students of the past who were not to know Belloc's secret they never suspected; Henry VIII having an energetic time courting Anne; and 'the Parliamentary struggle' as presented by the news sources of the time. Dark and fearsome countryside provides frissons of terror: Allied to this are country churchyards with memorials one including a few skulls , like.

But of course, as the Med provides the continuo for Ulysses, or steam trains the background for Close Encounter , the Thames naturally permeates the story, though mostly as background for amusing human activity. Jerome deploys just a few technical terms: J has an eye for status: Towing has several vignettes: And we have the hazards of drinking river water, and washing in it; the characters of lock keepers; angry swans; girls' clothes getting splashed by a hearty rowing man; and washerwomen before the days of electric washing machines.

Jerome even pleas for the simple life but with cautions against sea trips and early morning dips with a rowing-boat fable admittedly, he followed it with an apology: This is a world of small boys on street corners; small boys running errands—proof that telephones were not needed. And of houses and landladies; no doubt responsible to shadowy landowners. Jerome's technique, which works well enough with opening tinned pineapple, packing for a journey, ruminating over barometers and weather forecasts, trying to sleep, penetrating smells, trying to cook stew, doing what's now called DIY, avoids some issues: His account of writing his own material might have been worth reading.

And there must be something to learn from the sets of objects J avoids, for example the upper classes, complicated and tiresome negotiations, and negotiations generally—he omits amusing accounts of shopping, for instance, and horse-trading. He has nothing on pagan aspects of the world, though he knows about the Sandwich Islands: He has nothing on improving lectures for the lower orders. Jerome did not attempt the piano as a comic subject. Beefsteak pie, gooseberry tarts, leg of mutton, bacon, eggs, bread, butter, jam. Canned pineapple; I'd guess cans were expensive and for luxuries.

Fast food was chop houses: Only one of them knew what 'scrambled eggs' were. We also have 'bitter beer' which I suspect kept well, in days before refrigeration. And we have long clay pipes, made of kaolin, before cigarettes: Anyway; more jokes, anecdotes, narratives, unions against others as in 'Jews' laughing at 'goyim'. And what might be called 'craic'. Now, the shrewd reader will know that Jerome was not exactly a one hit wonder: Three Men on the Bummel is mostly set in Germany; for some reason—Brummagem?

A 'bummel' is an electric tramcar, for example in Dresden. Some of these have long ago vanished in Britain: Bacup was one of the first British places to have them, something you'd never guess, now. Jerome seems to have been co-opted into the anti-German lead-in to the 'Great War'; the last chapter of Three Men on the Bummel seem to have been inserted as part of this process.

I'll just note a few things here. Note on sightseers and historians: Gibbon had to trust to travellers' tales for a description of the Hellespont, and the Rhine was chiefly familiar to English students through.. Dr Johnson, familiar with little else than the view down Fleet Street, could read the description of a Yorkshire moor with pleasure and profit. To a cockney etc.

But we, or rather the steam-engine and the camera for us, have changed all that. Remember Germany was only recently unified. The disadvantage is that outside Hanover, which is only a small province, nobody understands this best German. Germany being separated so many centuries unto a dozen principalities, is unfortunate in possessing a variety of dialects.

Germans from Posen wishful to converse with men of Wurtemburg, have to talk as often as not in French or English; and young ladies who have received an expensive education in Westphalia.. An English-speaking foreigner, it is true, would find himself equally nonplussed among the Yorkshire wolds, or the purlieus of Whitechapel; but.. Throughout Germany it is not only in the country districts and among the uneducated that dialects are maintained.

Every province has practically its own language.. The explanation is that, in nine cases out of ten, he has learnt French from "Ahn's First-Course. Pilsener beer and Apollinaris water. Then Jerome on officials: With other evidence I'd suggest Jerome was part of the post anti-German drumbeat in Britain, added to the century-or-so old anti-Russian rumblings.

Later, his play, The Passing of the Third Floor Back , a lodging-house story, was turned into a depressing and moody black-and-white s film watchable on Internet. He may have ended his life as yet another fairly wealthy man with little in his head. How true this is, I have not attempted to discover. It is not science! Apparently written by a simple insect man.

I'd assumed this is a serious scientific work; such is the poor quality of modern reviewing. In fact it's painfully weak; in the process of reading it, I realised it's simply another part of the Jewish imposition of their ridiculous worldview. Let me start with an overview: Enfin, si vous voulez patienter intelligemment jusqu'au 5 mars, je vous conseille la lecture de "Mary Poppins, she wrote. The Life of P. Sortie de l'album We Love Disney.

Enfin, je voulais corriger quelques erreurs du livret, eh oui… Je chipote! Enfin, trois phrases me semblent incorrectes. Inutile de rechercher sur internet, on trouve les deux versions et en plus, chansons-disney. Tiana chante bien "Mais j'atteins le sommet"! Sortie de la bande originale du film La Reine des neiges. Vraiment un bel objet en tout cas.

Tout est simple ici, tout va de soi. Comment se sont faits les choix des morceaux? Je trouve cela fascinant: Vous dirigerez l'orchestre national de Lyon.

• .
• ;
• www.newyorkethnicfood.com: Catherine Sauret: Books, Biography, Blogs, Audiobooks, Kindle?
• The Bible as a Manual for Identity Theft.
• ?
• Pflegeplanung Inkontinenz (mit Falldarstellung) (German Edition).
• .

J'ai une collaboration de longue date avec l'Orchestre national de Lyon. Paris, 2 juillet Il cherchait un compositeur. Il est venu chez moi. La Petite boutique des horreurs nous avait mis au centre des attentions. Disney souhaitait renouveler le genre. Belle entre dans le village. Trois chansons sur cinq donc et au final deux Oscars [meilleure chanson et meilleure musique originale].

On reprend les anciennes chansons dans le musical. Je lui ai dit: La chanson traduit le tic-tac de la pendule, du temps qui passe. La chanson pour le film durait 9 minutes.

Avec tout ce temps, il serait mort! Yoni Amar est ravi: Et quand je suis sorti, je me suis dit: Rencontre exclusive avec Dimitri Granovsky. Sortie le 1er juillet Et puis en marchant, on apprend. SR [8 novembre ]. Notes liminaires de Jeff Bond: Jeff Bond, 9 janvier Dans Taram et le chaudron magique , nous avons un amalgame de tous les merveilleux styles musicaux de M. Heureusement pour nous, le morceau existe encore.

Randy Thornton, producteur, 12 janvier Extrait et traduction exclusifs pour les lecteurs de chansons-disney. Ils parlent en coulisses. Au cours du brainstorming, ils discutent des grands moments de l'histoire. Je pense que c'est vraiment essentiel pour lui. Ca paraissait tellement en dehors de ce qu'ils avaient fait avant. L'une s'appelait Les chants de la Virginia Company , une collection de chants marins anglais qu'il partagea avec Menken.

Comment pouvons-nous la lancer? Pocahontas sera exactement ce que vous attendez: Carol de Giere, Defying Gravity: Un seul livre retrace l'extraordinaire saga de ce projet hors norme: Pourquoi les dirigeants de Disney ont-ils choisi la France? Des chapitres tous plus passionnants les uns que les autres Achetez le livre "Disney et la France" au prix exceptionnel de 29,45 euros livraison gratuite en cliquant ici: En achetant par le biais de la boutique chansons-disney. Le mouvement est vivant, la musique est un mouvement.

Accueil - Près de paroles de chansons de Walt Disney !

Comment mieux percevoir cette puissance que d'y participer? Randy Thornton de Walt Disney Records ajoute: Ca fait vraiment poussiereux! Bref, c'est faire beaucoup de bruit pour pas grand chose! Ce sont de beaux objets mais creux: Le film est volontairement kitsch: Et puis finalement, changement de cap! Le meilleur de Disney: Et ce pour plusieurs raisons. Le pire de Disney: Que reste-t-il donc du conte Raiponce? Disney reprend tel quel un seul passage: Rien de cela chez Disney. Quelle lamentable incursion au pays de la fantaisie. Pas de bande originale du film en CD! Jamais je n'acheterai la BO enn mp3.

Une pochette de, de quoi d'ailleurs? Je sais ce n'est pas raisonnable, mais tant pis! Cet excellent film retrace la saga de la Walt Disney Company entre et En DVD, le 30 novembre Pour en savoir plus: Hischak et Mark A. Bref, quelque chose de moins plat. Scarecrow Press 28 juillet A part China Moses et Anthony Khavanagh N'y a-t-il donc pas assez de chanteurs d'origine africaine en France? Disney France ne semble avoir pris aucun risque et c'est bien dommage! Ci-dessus, Roy Disney et Michael Eisner. Disney et Edna Francis Disney. Paris, samedi 10 octobre Salle des ventes Rossini.

Pourtant lors de la vente du samedi 10, les lots semblaient se vendre Comment je m'en suis rendu compte? Je n'en reviens pas! Annecy, mardi 9 juin , 16h. Sherman et Richard M. Sherman et Jeffrey C. Le directeur de la photographie est Richard Numeroff. En dehors des yeux du public cependant la relation personnelle des deux hommes entre eux devenait de moins en moins harmonieuse. Disney, Samuel Goldwyn, Jr.