Inocêncio e o início da jornada (Portuguese Edition)

The course proposes to potentialiase the oniric universe of the participants, remix them, take them out of authorship, and bring them back to the field of experience, with the aim of creating a collective process of production of fictions and imaginaries. Participants constructors of the working process anti-jack of dreams: In , Brazil welcomed around thousand permanent immigrants. So we wonder, how is the current immigration situation in Brazil different from the past? How does the current Brazilian law considers immigrantion, in counterpoint with previous policies?

In the form of a round table, we will talk about the situation of immigrants in Brazil and about practical-legal concerns of immigration in Brazil, and their implications in the field of culture, art and economy. Why the immigration situation in Brazil has complicated so much, why Brazil ahs closed itself so much to immigration? And how does Brazil relate to the current waves of world migration and migratory crisis? Gilda Mantilla and Raimond Chaves, will be talking about their participation at the recent Venice Biennale , in which was inaugurated the Peruvian Pavilion with their installation Misplaced Ruins.

It address issues related to the representation of the national, while facing the problems derived from the translation of cultural contexts. They will also talk about the vicissitudes of the process that involves the insertion of the country in the dynamics inherent in major international exhibitions at a time when market forces coexist with the decline or the mere absence of cultural policies. They have also developed other proposals as Hangueando-Periodico con patas — , Mobile Workshops , or Cabinet of Curiosity — among others, willing to stake the capacity for understanding and agreement on the construction of the artistic field and the collective exercise of sharing experiences that enhance public arena.

In Mantilla and Chaves represented Peru at the 56th Venice Biennale, where for the first time the country had its own pavilion, with the installation Misplaced Ruins. Marina Fokidis is the head of the artistic office in Athens for Documenta Desde integra a Red Conceptualismos del Sur. Julien Bismuth will be discussing different forms of interaction and spectatorship in some of his recent work. Focusing on the difference between text and image, Bismuth will engage with the complexities of working in and between different mediums.

He has recently published three books with Motto in Berlin. Max Jorge Hinderer Cruz What is ideology? And what is the critique of ideology? Does ideology always come before our talking? Does it necessarily determine our thoughts? Does it determine who we love and with whom we fight? Is it only in our heads, or does it also have to do with our feelings, with our bodies, with our desires, and the psychoactive substances we consume?

Program for Autonomous Cultural Action. Reading group starting Restaurant opens at Ser e vir a Ser: He later continued his artistic training at Media-Art Academy in Cologne. In Encyclopaedia Cinematographica and Archives as Objects as Monuments , Keller focuses on the archaeology of scientific film and the impossibility of objective documentation. Como podemos viver felizes na nossa cidade? Estas entre outras, foram questionamentos que estimularam os pequenos a pensarem e discutirem sobre o ambiente a sua volta, seu corpo e a cidade. Com esse experimento, resolvemos transformar esse desejo em realidade.

Ladeira da rua Benjamin Constant [ escada da rua do Fialho ]. He co-curated the exhibition and catalogue Unknown Amazon: Amazonia in the Earth System: Eduardo Neves, What is Marginal? Archaeology as political science in ancient Amazonia. Roosevelt, The Amazon and the Anthropocene: Paulo Artaxao, Air quality and human health improvements from reductions in deforestation-related fire in Brazil. Marison de la Cadena, Uncomming Nature, http: Laura Burocco investiga a criatividade como um dispositivo de controle nas cidades do Rio de Janeiro e de Johannesburg, consideradas duas novas cidades criativas no Sul Global.

O projeto de doutorad o tem origem em dois estudos anteriores: Through two projects of urban revitalization [Porto Maravilha Rio and Maboneng Joburg ] it analyzes the homogenization of spaces and the neutralization of the urban experience that is propagated through such spaces. Finally the researcher interrogates the ways that spectacularization of and in the city can become a form of bio-power exercised over the lives of the people who inhabit these spaces. The project originates from two previous studies: The project is part of an academic research and artistic practice called Trilogy of Gentrification: Joburg Milano Rio de Janeiro.

Braamopoly, Room Gallery, Johannesburg ; Second stage in progress: Isola Art Center, Milano ; Third stage in thought: Between and she coordinated at the Brazilian Institute of Social and Economic Analyses — IBASE an international cooperation project aimed at strengthening communal participation with a special focus on gender and housing rights. Her areas of research: He is the curator or co-curator of many exhibitions: He will present his work as a director and curator in the contemporary art field in France and its Relationship with the international network.

Ele vive e trabalha em Berlin. Henri Michaux, Le nuit remue. Bik Van der Pol work collectively since They live and work in Rotterdam NL Through their practice they aim to articulate and understand how art can produce a public sphere, and to create space for speculation and imagination. This includes forms of mediation through which publicness is not only defined but also created. Their working method is based on co-operation and research methods of how to activate situations as to create a platform for various kinds of communicative activities.

It is temporal, implying action and the development of new forms of discourse. Their collaborative practice is both instigator and result of this method. Recent shows and projects include: What if the moon were just a jump away? Deze sokken niet wit, Van Abbemuseum ; Too late, too little, and how to fail gracefully, Kunstfort Asperen, ww.

They are advisors at the Jan van Eijck Academy in Maastricht. Quem tem medo de poesia? Como fazer coisas com palavras? Vida, morte e poesia? Celebration and evocation of feminism. We need to look at her again, perhaps to de-construct or re-construct her anew. We will be gathering around the pot where the beans and meat are slowly cooking to share recipes and stories. Everyone can stir or add spice as they wish.

We take time — one weekend — and on the last day will collectively consume and digest what has been prepared and produced. On Sunday afternoon 30th of August from 2pm to 9pm , we will eat the feijoada together with all who want to share this moment in a warm and creative atmosphere. The food will be sold for a very fair price and the profits will go to a charity organization supporting women. Quando a periferia invade o centro: The literary practices of the marginal movement are not restricted to paper and the book.

The work in progress aims to revive a little-known architectural plan designed by Oscar Niemeyer, called Centro da Barra. In this integrated city a varied composition of different social classes would live together. Major construction began in the late s, and soon Barra da Tijuca turned into an urban El Dorado for real estate developers. Many of the proposed public facilities were never realized and almost everything got privatized.

From a diversified neighborhood on the drawing board to a fortress of gated communities in reality, Barra da Tijuca symbolizes the takeover of private profits over public interests. With Barra as the main center for the Olympic games it seems that history repeats itself. Over the last few years land prices have tripled and Barra is again being sold as the new paradise in similar ways as in the early seventies.

As recent history shows no end to the fraudulent scams in the real estate market. The collection of the museum is planned to consist of documents found in an abandoned archive left behind in a vacant tower in Barra. In the end the connection -consisting of a territorial battle that manifests itself in different ways- between these two seemingly very different projects will be discussed.

The project is further developed in close collaboration with Raphi Soifer and Ingrid Hapke. It is made possible with financial support of the Mondriaan Foundation and the Federal State of Berlin. In the project will be exhibited in Studio X Rio together with a publication Onomatopee. Mini-Bios Wouter Osterholt develops site-specific projects in which he explores the public sphere as a domain where different communities collide. By adopting a research approach similar to investigative journalism, he seeks to reveal and unravel conflicting interests that define local politics and the organization of the public.

Through direct interaction with people, both bystanders and those immediately involved, the artist opens up delicate topics of debate. As a result his projects often take the shape of a public platform that activates individuals to articulate their personal relation to the political. It seeks to exceed the parameters of public dialogue and politics by entering the realm of imagination, unexpressed thoughts and dreams.

Wednesday the 24th of june at Professor do Instituto de Artes da Uerj. Artista residente da Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, em outubro de Professor visitante da Universidade de Chicago entre outubro e dezembro de It invents the tools to conceive artistic practices from all fields — visual art, dance, performance, theatre, literature, etc. Setting up projects with artists involves an often lengthy time of research, an absolute must to create strong connections between the artistic projects, the region and people.

In the form of an artistic tool, it takes place over two days and includes discussions intended to be moments for sharing, performances and workshops, on different scales and in different formats. This meeting is the opportunity to break down the divide between audiences and specialists, to roll out a singular tool that encourages experiences of art and politics rather than representations of them, the circulation and comparison of ideas rather than their authoritative forms of transmission.

Printemps des Laboratoires offers an opportunity to nurture research and explore a variety of current artistic, historical and critical contexts, both French and international. Performing Opposition will be foregrounding the antagonistic movements that reconfigure, across the globe and from one local to another, the map of a power that is now diffuse and molecular — an art that is also capable of eluding its ties to the institution in order to continue to develop therein, in spite of everything, critical and operative strategies.

This edition of the Printemps des Laboratoires will set up a dialogue between diverse experiences and perspectives. Our guests include specialists in the fields of activist movements Brian Holmes , avant-garde movements Marc Partouche , digital cultures Marie Lechner, Nathalie Magnan , and also the links between theatre and political modernity Diane Scott.

These discussions will take shape amid a varied programme which will include a musical accompaniment by pianist Alexey Aasantcheef, presenting a set composed of works by Cornelius Cardew, punctuated by revolutionary pieces which the audience will be invited to sing; performances by students of the Oslo Academy of Fine Art; an evening meal open to all; a screening juxtaposing contemporary films Egyptian filmmakers Jasmina Matwaly and Philip Rizk and the Palestine-based DAAR collective and a documentary about a major s play Paradise Now by Living Theater.

In she created and managed the contemporary art platform Rosascape, an independent art centre based in Paris. She is interested in production strategies, the artistic research process and reflections on the role of artwork and ways of sharing it with the public — through formats such as exhibits, performances, conferences, and publications — for all disciplines. In she created and managed Rosascape, a platform for contemporary creation in Paris that straddles multiple spheres as a private art centre and production unit, exploring the contexts of production and reception of works as well as their mode of display by attending to specific notions such as the question of private, intimate space vs public and political space.

A critical awareness of the standardisation of exhibition spaces in the context of globalisation, and thus of the standardised relationship between the artwork and the public, led us to seek and occupy a site and experiential sphere of a different kind — a left-field space — and displace, in this way, our relationship to contemporary art. The very particular relationship between these elements is the context in which artists-in-residence make and develop their projects. The collegial approach aims to establish collectives that enable new forms of intersubjectivity to take shape.

In collaboration with the co-direction team, she works on developing novel communities that alter and transform according to the shifts and developments in their work. The institution is renowned for the collective productions it has generated, for fostering collaborations between artists across the entire spectrum of disciplines, and for its participatory, community-building projects involving local residents. Suggestion de publications et films en lien avec le Printemps des. Comment fais-je pression sans le vouloir?

Comment faire pression en le voulant? Unleashing the Collective Phantoms: These insurgent essays develop and critique some of the cultural and artistic projects that first arose with the worlwide wave of protests, around the turn of the millennium, against what the global South has long called neoliberalism. Dissent and the refusal of a programmed existence return continually to the street, but they also unfold in the intimacy of the imagination. Complex discourses and elaborate fictions pass through images, works, ideas and wild scenarios that hover around the edges of reality; museums, cinemas, books and theatres are only temporary homes for such things, and authors only a convenience.

Times leaches away the graffiti of revolt, and the cynicism of power lays a new coat of paint. Yet still the collective phantoms return. These essays engage with the politics of aesthetics and artistic practice. Which roles can art projects, art spaces, self-organized academies and labs play in developing conceptions of the world that go beyond purely economic globalization? Projects from various parts of the world are invited to propose and test out other realities of life and world views, from small artistic attempts to social experimentation. Topics such as dealing with cultural differences, climate change, processes of levelling out and confusing complexities form the basis for a common space in which to rise questions.

The basis for Other Possible Worlds — Proposals on this Side of Utopia is a collection of ideas, concepts, models, terms, projects, kits and modes of acting. It is conceived as a pool for further projects in other parts of the world, it is open to further extension and it allows for varied formats. The NGBK is considered as a common and active space of inquiry for different formats like artistic contributions and installations, workshops, presentations, talks and video screenings.

Since this quinquennial is a must in the field of contemporary art in public space. Curated by Gianni Jetzer and Chris Sharp. Partout dans le monde les peuples se rebellent. Partout dans le monde les peuples tentent de se saisir de leur destin. Bien que le quotidien y devienne invivable. Over the past twenty years, an abundance of art forms have emerged that use aesthetics to affect social dynamics.

These works are often produced by collectives or come out of a community context; they emphasize participation, dialogue, and action, and appear in situations ranging from theater to activism to urban planning to visual art to health care. Engaged with the texture of living, these art works often blur the line between art and life.

This book offers the first global portrait of a complex and exciting mode of cultural production—one that has virtually redefined contemporary art practice. Like the exhibition, the book is a landmark survey of more than projects selected by a thirty-person curatorial advisory team; each project is documented by a selection of color images.

Modern theater history is punctuated by instances of scandalized audience members disrupting and in some cases suspending the first production of a new play. Such incidents are usually dismissed as riots, as self-evident displays of philistinism. La Fabrique , Playgrounds, Reinventing the square, ed.

A Politics of the Performative. Deterritorializing the Palestinian Parliament. Para a fala desta quarta aconselhamso a leitura de: Par ent esis Art Book Publisher, In she is the curator of the 8th Norwegian Sculpture Biennial.

www.newyorkethnicfood.com 's new features, an early look - www.newyorkethnicfood.com Ninja

As Director of Hordaland Art Centre in Bergen, Norway she curated several exhibitions and seminars, as well as further developed its residency programme. Her interests are in artistic and curatorial collaborations as well as developing the language that surrounds art productions of today, linguistically, spatially and structurally. Vive e trabalha no Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, ; El Parqueadero. Inserts in the field of anthropology?

Anna Bella Geiger — Artist. Held solo exhibitions and participated in group in Brazil and abroad, as in the Biennial of Sao Paulo and Venice. Published , with Fernando Cocchiarale , the geometric abstractionism book and informal Funarte , The Adolescent Girl, Margaret Mead. Kodwo Eshun, More Brilliant than the Sun: A Ritual to Reverse the Spell of the Illusion of Power as Control We will collectively perform a ritual to reverse the spell of the illusion of power as control.

Only the interface could be more modern I personally use OpenOffice. Create a "nice" document with OOo as it's possible , open it with Office with Sun plugin or other , and just make some design changes: But it's just "another UI" Dev should now work for the user experience, with the final D ocument in their mind OOo have to fight with its quality, not with price: I really hope an impressive 3.

Anthony, France I hope my English was limpid: Open Office Writer still needs a decent envelope setup. In Word, not only can I automatically add the envelope to the document, but I can actually print it. In OO Writer, the only print options are for printers that place the envelope flap on the right; I don't know of any HP or Brother printers that do not require the flap to be on the left. Results when I place the flap on the right are disastrous! I agree with anonymous above; the envelope flap problem is why I have to go back to Word from Linux every time I want to print a letter with envelope.

Your post is now linked to Tux Vermelho, sorry for my mistake!! Microsoft puts out a decent product that has to as in "mandatory" do things OpenOffice can't--period. I'm cool with that. Just don't pretend like Office isn't a good product, because it is. As for security, a lot of the reason OO doesn't have the security problems that Office does is that there is next to no market penetration.

That million users figures someone mentioned isn't really likely, IMO. A lot of people who have downloaded OO almost certainly did it for comparison purposes. I still use Word, although I'd consider Wordperfect if my firm would do a wholesale switch. I simply can't wait for the new Ooo. The new features look really nice I might actually have fun while writing papers and such. I wish there was and open document standard that all Word Processors had implemented. However that wouldn't give MS the chance to lock you into their Word Processor that's the whole point of having it as a De facto standard.

I think though as more people recognize Programs like Ooo and Abiword they will stop using the proprietary Options as the Foss ones give the user so much Freedom and usability. Well if you were any sorta versed in open source and usability I've been using OO since June last year and haven't turned back. Its faster and way less clunky. Not to mention its really stable imho. Good work OO guys!

If you think outlook is good. The upcoming thunderbird based app called spicebird will kill outlook. Some ppl told speed problems Only part I miss is links on x-references. I was hoping to have "Cross-references to headings" into v2. I can't believe I will have to wait until 3. OOo is missing too other basic features, like saying to OOo that such or such text style does not need any orthographic checks i.

I miss another feature too: I would be happy to click on any item into my table of content to go to the corresponding page. Compatibility is a good target. However, the missing basic features strongly decreases the OOo value. Outlook - at least make a good integration with Thunderbird, i. But ideally - bring meeting scheduling, task management and note making as good as in MS Outlook!

Project - there is no yet any cross-platform product as functional as MS Project. Personally I like OpenOffice and for myself working in a large corporate environment, we'd switch if there were two features that seems like they could easily be improved: This is probably the 1 usage item for Excel in my company and only being able to add 4 items to total up or sum etc isn't enough. I have some XLS spreadsheets with 20 or more I can't just recreate this 5 times.

Also - there needs to be better Pivot Table look up functions in Calc. Those don't exist today. Not so with Calc to Impress, I've only been able to get it to work once and it took a while. This item also needs to be seemless so that it works as easily as in MS Office. I'm really not whining, just want to explain the situation from where I sit. We've spent countless millions okay, I know how much, but can't share that on MS Office products over the years and really don't want to incur the expense of Office On the other hand, we'll get forced in that direction if MS decides to end support for Office XP and no other package out there supports those two issues above like Excel and PowerPoint do.

I use OpenOffice at home and no longer have MS Office installed, but at the office, I have both and at this point, if I had to go to one, it wouldn't be the one I use at home. OpenOffice is a great product, but in order to compete with one with a development budget in the millions to billions of dollars, it does need a few things. This is utter BS. Yes most of them are actually good applications that Microsoft has bought and added to the MSO family, but there are alternatives and actually it is seldom a problem that the applications has not been published by the same developer.

While the alternatives is found on dozens of platforms. Also if you want buy the entire list of applications that you have compiled - you have to pay up a sum, that you could buy a small nation for.

While the alternative costs OpenOffice does most of the things I want. I tried to use MS Word for my thesis, and gave up on its handling of maths, citations, and x-ref. However, for ordinary use I'll stick to OOo its free. Do you think that without OOo we would have seen any price reductions in MS? In my experience most people do not use the full feature set of either product.

I suspect that this is a mixture of poor documentation and just wanting to get the job done. I have seen the same pattern with plain text editors. I should like to see Word's normal view, i. Keep up the good work. It's not just a comment, but 2 questions. And convert them as well? Read and edit VBA files? Well, the comment might have been: I like Oo but if I need to open a document it take an enormous amount of time on Windows and Linux machines: Regarding Word Outline View: Regarding Exchange and Outlook: Also, Spicebird and Chandler look promising.

Yes, performance is being improved with every release. Thanks Andrew, this is going to be a number one "PDF" priority, right now. I do have some valuable code from a couple of books on Access I look forward to version 3. But I wouldn't have a clue how to wite the plugin. I am pleased to see better support for tables. Producing tables in Impress via imbeded links to Calc takes a lot of getting used to and a LOT of tweaking to get right.

I hope Impress v3. Even using the classes that appeared to be in OO's classpath. This could be improved! If I am going to get buy-in where I work, the old-skool looks of OO won't impress. I'm sorry, but it's just human nature. Keep up the good work! I've used Microsoft, Corel, and Open source software for years. Though the default standard here is Microsoft Office.

For power users, I advise them to evaluate the product against their needs. If it works, use the product. The MS sucks. Don't get me wrong, there are some nice components to MS Office, but as a whole??? To me they are familiar and easier to use. The tool bar should be the minimalist view, and auto-hiding the whole tool bar should not be the only optional choice. MS missed on this one.

The document is the most important. I like the earlier suggestion for a tab style editor for documents writer, calc, presentation. One neat feature in MS Excel is the ability to sort data based on the color of the cell or the font color. This adds a third dimension to the data beyond row and column.

Microsoft is very nervous Some of the comments on this list were so far off the mark for this to go uncommented. MS Office doesn't come with half the stuff people are talking about. Common lets get real. As to using "OOo for thesis" I did and it worked just fine. Lets get real - OOo releases every 6 months or so, is improving yes, its not perfect but bang for your buck you can't go wrong MS Office interface is one of the best I've ever seen - please, implement this kind of interface in 3.

A thememanagment would be mutch better. But IMHO the priority of this is low. I'm using OOo at work and home and it works fine for my needs. There are strange complaints here about stuff that OOo "doesn't do", but actually does. Page numbering works just fine in OOo, and you can do a lot with it. Here's a sample dissertation template that does this with page numbers in Roman and Arabic, page numbers displaying on some pages and not others, and so on: See the template example, above, which does that in OOo even in 2.

Okay, it's an extra step, but it's not a big deal; you can certainly DO it today. To manipulate the outline, you can use the "Navigator" on the toolbar its icon looks like a compass. It doesn't have all the capabilities of some other outliners, but you can promote, demote, and move items. I'd like to see this enhanced, but that's all it needs I do agree that more time should be spent making it "pretty". Many users will make a choice on whether or not to use OOo based on its "prettiness", in the mistaken assumption that that means something about its utility.

I've been using OOo for big documents for years - it works quite well. There's a lot to like about OOo already. MS likes to make a monopoly out of everything while usually upping the price. I don't ever see people being required to pay for OpenOffice. Let's face it, you probably wouldn't have even tried OpenOffice if you had to pay for it.

But, since Microsoft has a set standard around businesses and their file formats; most people are obligated to pay for the proprietary software. In short, if you're going to compare two things, be fair Please better compatibility with. The people do not want use OOo because this compatibility problem, table issues, arrows into doc files etc.

Popular articles

Now doc, xls and ppt especification are oppened, will be mode easy to improve this. The Office icon pack is more attractive. A little number of people know how to change the icon pack. I think it's a good idea change the default icon pack for Windows to call more people in a first impression. At my workplace we have MS Office etc like most other educational organistaions and I can get it free for home use on their licence. However I use OO at home for two reasons: It does almost anything the ordinary person would want much more than MS Works which came with the computer without having to take it in to have MS Office installed; if I want the more comprehensive features of MS Office I can log on to my workplace server and use it from there anyway.

I do not see how anyone can reasonably expect OO to be "better" overall than MS Office with the shoestring vs commercial development budget but I think they do an amazing job for something that is "free" at the point of delivery. As a more demanding user there are, however, certain things that make it impossible to depend on OO for work purposes: Aside from that, things like the lack of efficiency features such as drag-and-drop editing in Writer would be frustrating for anyone doing a large quantity of composing and editing.

Apple has taken a back to basics approach in iWork and it has been a phenomenal thing for my day to day office needs. What would be great is if there were genius developer volunteers that could take OOo or a fork of OOo and model iWork's UI, intuitiveness, focus on making great looking documents. I mean, in Numbers having multiple tables on a single sheet complete with drag and drop templates for gorgeous layouts Better yet, that same group of genius developer volunteers could make a lighter-weight, cross-platform Mozilla XULRunner-based office suite that redefines office suites.

Not that Mozilla could likely match the performance of even OOo, but it's a nice thought if something could be done to take advantage of the awesome Mozilla platform. Sadly, as someone else pointed out, it's not about the price or freedom, it's about the quality--and the fact is that Apple and to a lesser degree Microsoft I hate myself for saying that have driven innovation while open source software has been running to catch up and copycat. Firefox is a clear exception. For those who feel compelled to announce that they will not switch to OOo because X,Y, or Z features are not present, or otherwise complain about OOo's failings, I refer you to the "Linux is NOT Windows" article that effectively explains important differences between open source and commercial software.

I particularly refer you to "Subproblem 3a: There is a culture" and "Problem 7: Do you want to contribute to change something in OOo? Just vote for some issues - for example to change this awful gray background! Is there no "organisation" to get money to pay developers for programming OOo? Like the old time of shareware?

Would some people of you pay some money to get OOo improvements? I hope you can understand my English Open Office's word processor deletes the embedded literature-citation codes in Microsoft Word documents. I am eagerly awaiting such a feature, so that I can make the switch. Without it, I am left on the outside part of the Open Office, able only to look into the Windows. I didn't know there was an Open Offce 3. Thanks for posting this!

Having not done much research into openoffice since gasp I know - I'm glad to see several improvements have been made to it since then. I'll certainly check it out on my next build. How much do u pay for MS office? People are voluntarily creating software for you to use. How many people do you think can afford Office? Interesting that OOo has a bug since 1. Except that crash is pretty bad by iself it seems like this can be used as a security problem as it is a buffer overflow.

I too would love to see interface improvements. So far from what I've read it's improved quite alot. Anonymous April 10, How can anybody want that many styles? My thesis was somewhere in the low double figures and that includes quotes, lists, graphs, equations with proofs and various other things.

I know that importing documents imports its styles.

You do not need a different style for every paragraph, sentence, or character. A well planned document has a few styles. Cuanto de cierto es que todas las mejoras en el desarrollo OOo aportadas por los usuarios tester giualmente enriquecen las herramientas, las que finalmente pasan a formar parte integral de una solucion comercial posterior ya sea directamente o atraves del medio o empresa que posteriormente comercializa la solucion paquetizada Estamos frente a una situacion de filosofia utopica FREE, la que finalmente es parte de una iniciativa comercial igualmente estonsces de que hablamos realmente Mucha filosofia pero la realidad es fria.

As some people said, I would really like to see a better appearance. I know that a lot as been changed and wow does it look better than OpenOffice. Let's update the drop down menus and toolbar buttons. Let's get them updated and appear better to the eye like Microsoft Office! But I do have to say, so-far so-good! As noted elsewhere, the GUI will be Symphony-esque approach, by putting the contextual options on the right side of the screen rather than the top, since documents are vertical. Also, you can get a sneak peek at the new interface graphics by visiting the Visual Design site at: Not sure if I'm crazy about it so far To be honest, I don't know why all of you are complaining.

The current interface looks fine. And OOo Writer works great. I've been working on really long documents, and it hasn't crashed once. If it had been MSWord, And as for OpenOffice Calc I'm saying this even though I use Excel almost all of the time. I haven't gotten used to Calc yet. But I've been with OpenOffice for years now.

But seriously, people be grateful you're getting this for FREE. Hopefully tracked changes will work perfectly in v3. They're not trustworthy or stable in 2. Currently it seems the colors are automatically selected: My screenshot shows multiple colors because I have multiple authors. Feel free to check the Notes2 web pages for more information.

I love reading all the complaining especially the "ugly GUI" , and the feature-for-feature arguments, but then again, I think that the graffiti on bathroom stalls is funny that is, when it isn't completely disturbing. Its like kids on the playground, one kid says: Well, saving money is always a good thing, and thinking about how often I use all these MS Office specific features there are out there, I decided I really didn't need to spend money for a group of features I just didn't use.

I can't justify it. I bet that there are a lot of other people out there that, if they gave it some real thought, wouldn't be able to justify it either. Right now that would probably involve compatibility with other office formats. I can't complain about OpenOffice, and I'm not about to tell other people how to spend their money. If you absolutely need something besides OpenOffice because you have to have some feature, you go for it.

I hope it's worth it. I actually liked the concept of the ribbon, but then found it impossible to find everything. The implementation wasn't consistant which all GUIs must be for ease of use what with some functions on the ribbon and some on the button - took me a while to realise that which probably makes me a retard. Nevertheless, it still made think that endless toolbars floating around the window were not the way forward. Then I saw the Lotus Symphony stuff also free btw. Now there is a really clever approach.

In fact it copies very closely a GUI which pretty much every computer user in the world is familiar with. Be it internet exploder or firefox here is something that works. GUI isn't about icons people who have issues with that either grow up or spend a few some time making your own so we don't have to listen to you it is about interaction that's why it is called an interface. Here is an area where OO. Ultimately, an office suite needs to be able to make everyday office tasks faster. It needs to reliable, efficient and easy to use. Specialised features are not what it is about.

It is frustrating occasionally being limited in more specialised areas I'm a scientist so the chart improvements are vital for me, but how many of you need error bars?

Free Online Download Inocêncio E O Início Da Jornada Portuguese Edition Pdf B00cqndmv8

If you want special features, find something that was designed for whatever field your working in. I am using OO. Although for the developer Ribbon like toolbar is very easy because it is basically a tabbed page containing some user controls, nothing else. Hope in near future, next update will include all of these. Thank you for a wonderful suite of effective tools, OOo developers. A friend recently asked I would mind helping to edit a book she wrote. I had to really do some tinkering to get the Works documents to format properly. That turned out to be a joke.

My solution was to do what should have been done in the first place: It took a while, but I managed to take care of her project. I edited to my heart's content, then saved in. Start times are wonderful with OOo 2. Obviously you haven't tried using it. Oh, and I think that the Office interface sucks, big time, and so do a lot of my customers.

Despite being a core linux user, i must admit that when going for documentation, i prefer ms office 1. Amazing font rendering common guys linux user must accept that 4. I hate being forced down a route, OO looks crap, is always unstable and i am fed up of anti mircostf geeks trying to force it down my neck and saying that 00 is better. I'm sorry but it is not better, it looks dated and basically is for the geeks outthere! I am an it professional and have been for amny years, and if you want reliability then don't use open crap office! Guys, all good and well, but have a look at Google Docs, which is what I am using - and it works almost with the Open Doc standard - we've seen quite a productivity increase since we've started using it in our small company.

The one thing I would love to have in OpenOffice is file versioning. The ability to set it so that when you save a doc the previous version is not saved over but moved to a different folder so that you can roll back to any previous version of a file you like. I think it would be a nice 1-up on microsoft if it was actually built into Openoffice. It is the one thing preventing me from fully migrating to linux atm.

Click on File and then click on Versions. Also, there are other ways to accomplish the same. After all the hard work there is still a large number of people complaining whats missing from OOo, I've not even heard of most of the features people request but if its so important why dont they go ahead and write them into OOo themselfs??

Im sick of people comparing it to MS Office, Its a great program and it has alot of great features, stop being picky and start to realise how hard it is to write such a great program. Regarding the "Notes 2" view. It does seem like an a good idea for editing a note, and makes visually finding a note a bit easier than the little yellow blocks were. But, on my screen it takes up a lot of room. It also seems to foul up the zoom Optimal and Width presets, shifting the editable area to include that new right side expanse.

And after zooming manually I usually have to scroll horizonally to get a workable area Yuk! OOo Writer now needs more zoom controls, one for "Width" and one for "Optimal" that center the editable area and totally ignore that Notes panel. Way too much fussing needed if you aren't at the moment interested in editing the notes.

• ;
• A uma atriz (Portuguese Edition).
• Narcolepsy: A Clinical Guide.

I have very realistic ideas of what openoffice should be like, and for the most part I am completely satisfied. There is only one thing that keeps me using AbiWord instead: Seriously, how AbiWord can support this and OO doesn't is completely beyond me. That said, hopefully they'll fix it by 3. I really like the way the facts are presented over here.

If OSS gets the same interface the competition is going to be a hell lot more than what is expected. I am so grateful that open office exists. I work 2 jobs and also go to school, so anything that's free is great help. SO, thank you guys for being so awesome-your work is appreciated and I can't wait for the next version to be released! For the people who think like one user whoo says "The GUI is the last thing the developers will work on. Since, frankly, it's the least important thing ", well that is one of the biggest issues with open source software, generally speaking, since it is really developed for technical people by technical people.

Yes some businesses and organisations will use OO because on the 4 of 5 necessary biz apps of Word, Excel. Powerpoint and Adobe pdf and they can save a small fortune. However, the current economic and credit crunch problems will for sure get more companies to re-think their IT expenditure and some will switch to OO, even if the GUI is not so great. However, Outlook, despite all it issues is still an indispensible application and even Evolution is still too cluncky for most people.

However Zimbra looks amazing, only just came across it today. One last point, although GUI is very important and needs improving, the Office GUI is completely wrong, and only useful for spoon-feeding complete newbies, grannies, grandpas. Most people hate it, and only use it because their company upgraded. Most people know where to find what they need under a normal menu system. Actual the best implementation of having lots of relevant options available at a specific point in whatever needs doing was 10 years ago with Lotus Smartsuite. If you needed to bold something you would get a menu pop up wi other format options, so save hunting around.

Worked great, whilst still keeping the menu system. I actually think that if IBM promote Symphony better it will be a better option for businesses compared to OO, possibly. Certainly the GUI gets better marks. However, Outlook, despite all it issues is still an indispensible application and even Evolution is still too clunky for most people. Most people hate it, that a proven fact, and only use it because their company upgraded and they have no choice. Actually the best implementation of this concept was 10 years ago with Lotus Smartsuite! Certainly the GUI gets higher marks.

When are you finally releasing and MS Outlook like application? For years it is the only thing that have kept me from pushing my corporate customers into. Is there a drawback to this? Any way thank you for this great product, I consider it a great thing for humanity. A straigth forward communication with Google Docs would be much appreciatted as well. You will need to combine either application with a Microsoft-Exchange-equivalent.

As to Outlook replacement, none exist. Over a year later no such entity seems to exists. I've been trying OOo 3. Now I'm exploring ways of combining OpenOffice. I have however found that the Notes2 format and the commenting function in Google Docs are not compatible. I hope to see these formats fully compatible in the future.

• The Women Who Reconstructed American Jewish Education, 1910-1965 (HBI Series on Jewish Women)!
• Platos Podcasts: The Ancients Guide to Modern Living;
• Tangled in Two!
• Chart of Darkness.
• ;
• A Photographic Tour of Kodiak Alaska!
• The Log Entries of Jenny Terran 00-42.

Probably would Google have to catch up with Notes2. Thank you for an interesting post but I agree with one of the comments above: And this is great that now there are so much professional and affordable software on web which helps people to deliver information and ideas to others.

I have used Linux as my primary operating system for about 11 years. My work earlier required the use of LaTeX, which is a superior markup solution to word or oo anyways, so I did not feel the lack of Microsoft Word or its clones. However, over the past two years, I have had to write grant proposals in conjunction with other people who use word. So, for a few months I struggled with OO 2. If first permitted me to run Microsoft Office and now I use it successfully with Microsoft Office I must congratulate the OO team for doing such a great job in the absence of open standards.

Sometimes, references are messed up, sometimes captions are mangled and sometimes margins are totally wrong, plus it cannot handle tracking changes. If you know anything about proposal writing, you know that there is ZERO tolerance for any deviation from prescribed format, which for some agencies changes every 6 months. They are looking to reject your proposals even before they get to the review stage. Its not OO's fault. They are up against a problem of reverse engineering, and as most engineers know, reverse engineered products that chase a moving target Microsoft's specs, if they even exist rarely work satisfactorily.

Whether we like it or not, the "standards" quotes are essential out in the marketplace are defined by Microsoft Word. Until the ODF spec gets a serious market share, this situation will continue and imperfect translations will keep putting people like me off. I would much rather use LaTeX which offers much superior output and is completely cross platform, but one has to live with the reality of the profession one is in I am an academic and do research in engineering.

When I write papers, I still require my students to write them in LaTeX, but when it comes to proposals, the matter is out of my hands. I will look at OO3 when its stable release comes out, but given the track record of chasing closed specs, I am not holding out any hope. There's a huge amount of controversy here and as someone who has recently dumped MSOffice in favour of OpenOffice for almost all of the various PC's on our local and VPN networks I can sympathise with both prevailing views.

Three things in my work that would make a significant difference to me are: Being able to do this in OpenOffice 3. The probability that this will be available across all open file types soon is amazingly attractive, especially given the latency issues surrounding similar offerings from Google et al. I can also appreciate the difficulties in bundling various open source technologies to include a robust email client and exchange like functionality. It would however make the transition from MSOffice much easier, having just done this by trialling a whole variety of open source alternatives.

There are a lot of products out there - and many of them work very well. An OpenOffice stamp of approval on existing solutions would really not go astray. We deal with a lot of XML files, and even simply having the means to import them into a spreadsheet as rows of data, rather than formatted XML would make life easier.

But I can see that this might not be of much interest to many users. Lastly, the OpenOffice and open source and open standards technologies have come so far in the past five years that the old technologies are really threatened. Personally, and especially as a software engineer, I see little point in supporting most of them now some remaining and annoying compatibility issues not withstanding especially when we consider what the next five years will bring. I regularly check OOo and Linux releases to see if they would finally help me escape from Windows or at least from Word.

Trouble is, I have to work wih Trados a translation-tool based on Word macros and templates, and Windows , as do most of my translator collegues wordwide. Will somebody finally pay some attention to us? At least free us from bloody Word by making OOo completly compatible in all aspects, so we can combine it with Trados!

I have to agree with previous comments OO is just not as good a Office Not far off but not quite there. The UI needs to be improved the office 97 style should be long gone. I don't mean copying the office ribbon I mean going one step better. People are quite fickle if OO get the same or greater feature set that Office and if the UI is prettier then people will move in their masses.

Its a shame as I believe this is the only block preventing Linux becoming the OS of choice. There are a lot of complaints here. Open Office is a great piece of open software. I have been using it for months. I am happy with the existing and upcoming features. From a corporate perspective, I think the key issues are: Once we get done with our implementation, we will try to contribute a set of real office templates.

Hopefully, that will reduce the problems. Thank you OO developers! I wish you the very best. Anyhow, I feel that there are some improvements that still need to be refined. Compatibility- Importing MS files is not the problem, it's when you send the document to an individual who only uses MS Office. The file opens up on MS Office with alignments being way off and the headers and footers displayed in chaotice ways as wells. In order for OOo to be called "compatible," it needs to import and export files in the exact way they were created.

Beggars can't be choosers, but update the presentation on the program. It sometimes makes me feel as if "Ace of Base" is playing somewhere in the background. I would very much -I repeat- would like to see an Outlook killer. It is not only the IMAP thing, a new standard might very well be created soon on the universal document thing.

It is the integration of a collaboration and personal management structure built into Outlook that haven't been beaten yet -perhaps? With all due respect, who ever suggested me before to use TBird with the calendar add on instead can now see he lost the point. Perhaps it is renewing this collaborating and personal management structure we have become so attached to, a much better call.

To see what I mean please take a look at Google Apps. They have managed to get together mail, collaborative intranet, agenda, calendar and Todo's list. I anyone is about to choose an office software suite I would recommend, forget the MS thing, forget the way its been before, go to the Google Apps. And again I want to thank the team that has been able to put together such a fine thing as Open Office, you've given prime quality tools to almost everyone in the world, that much.

I have read many of the comments and many of those miss an important point. I will use OOo if only to encourage its cchallenge. Anyway, most of us just don't care if there is no outline thingy or super whatssit. It writes letter well. Thanks for OOo Josie. We uue Apple Mac's and PC's here so here are my comments.

Office on the Mac is Crap, OOo is mediocre. This program is central to our business. Groove and Infopath are an excellent team working together for important forms that need filling in. We are using this all the time. There is no alternative in OOo or the Open Source world in general. They only know how to use Office Basic Features, you start openoffice in front of them and they dont even know how to change font!

Have you tried OpenOffice. Instead of moaning, why not contribute to the project and the opensource community. Considering the Open Office is free software, people seem shockingly quick to dismiss it. Can you ever remember a time when somthing so good was free? MS office used to have similar issues, and yet people were still happy to pay for it. Yes, OO isn't ready to take over from MSoffice in the vast majority of workplaces, but its plenty good enough for home use and small businesses, especially given the cost!

What is wrong with you people? Iam evalutation OOo to replace MSoffice in a mid-size business - the version 2. Iam now testing version 3. I am not just complaoining I do plan on seeing if I can code soemthing - but my biggest problem is that OOo dosent notify if the file is already in use by another user. People complain about its unfamiliarity while simultaneously asking that we do not judge OOo for being unfamiliar coming from Office Having used the interface for a few months now, I can say that it is substantially faster than the dialogue trees in conventional toolbar setups and certainly never slower once you pass the initial familiarity hurdle speaking as someone writing scientific papers, oh god the formatting and the charts and huuurg tedium.

It's worth bearing in mind when hearing about all the corporation drone complaints that the typical cubicle worker is the same class of people that many IT department nightmare stories are about; the lack of serious formatting in most of their output combined with a dearth of familiarization sessions for things like software changes means they tend to learn the new interface excruciatingly slowly, only finding features when they need them and then forgetting about it in the gaps between uses. Also, for scientific purposes Excel is practically a necessity for its statistical package; it isn't just the ability to perform functions like least squares regression but the fact that the software is very heavily tested for the reliability of the output, something an open project typically doesn't have, or even most other commercial products in that area for that matter.

As a horribly crude comparison, it's like using Wikipedia versus journals - while you can probably get an answer for free, what you're pay for is the checking and validation of accuracy. But goddam my wallet likes OOo and I can't wait for it to become more on par with commercial applications.

Every once in a while, I check on OO's status. I do give it to people who need an office suite - without the money. OO has changed how MS sells their software. Which isn't quite a bad thing. Come'on, people can't find out how to change the font in OO Writer? Its there on the tool bar. But the last time I checked, making a default layout is limited compared to MS-O. But, I've discussed with those who work on OO, that one of the big problems is that OO is designed more by programmers than Office users Hence, the lack of certain features seems to go over their heads. It was like that with Final Writer for Amiga back in the 90s.

Even by today's standards, the Final Writer's Spellchecker is far smarter than MS-Office It can guess phoneticly, not by a mis-spelling database.

What was the problem? The programmers thought that having aREXX automatioc controls was more important than having something useless Same here with OO. When someone posted about the doing a mailing list, someone responded "not a big deal, easy to do" - but failed to understand that MS-Word can get the mailing list from Outlook or a simple phonebook. Sorry but that is a BIG stupid mistake to ignore How hard is it to make a PIM?

In the past, I recommended people download the free Palm Desktop software. But that doesn't solve most issues. It holds notes, dates, and contact info Oh, apparently Sunbird is dead anyways. The "oh, just get another program like Evolution" isn't cutting it. Thats also like saying "oh just get MS-Office and be done with it" you know. Clicking on a contact's email addy goes straight to an email client. Its only for Windows thou, and not applicable for OO of course.

But that should be an example of How to do things. So to the folks who make OpenOffice - you guys are doing a good programing job, but SUN, IBM whoever needs to pay for some development enhancements if it can't be done for free. Most all these are good reviews. I have used OO extensively. It simply leaves Microsoft in the dust. Why harp on the compatability? Yes, I know there are the issues. But when you compare that to the nightmare of MS Office My wife uses it at her work and complains about it nightly There is so much more that you can do in OO compared to MS Office, it is ridiculous to think MS has the edge.

Soon, I think the MS office will go the way of where Visio has headed, to the backburner. Costs are paramount and if you think the functionality is where it counts, ask a controller in these days of cutbacks. Subscribe in reader Subscribe by email. March 19, at 8: March 19, at 9: P March 19, at 9: March 19, at And still no outline mode We get PDF editing facilities in 3.

I think that is a way cool feature. Not everyone can afford a newer MacTel machine. March 19, at 1: March 19, at 2: March 19, at 3: March 19, at 4: You're doing great work! March 19, at 5: This comment has been removed by the author. March 19, at 6: March 19, at 7: Thank you for the concise yet thorough writeup! March 20, at 3: Powerpoint with embedded flash still doesn't work: March 20, at 5: Especially comparing to MS Office March 20, at 6: March 20, at 8: March 20, at 9: March 20, at March 20, at 1: March 20, at 6: March 20, at 7: March 21, at March 21, at 3: March 21, at 7: March 21, at 9: Now, one important feature is missing: This new version will keep clogging my taskbar.

March 21, at 4: March 21, at 6: March 22, at 4: March 22, at OOwriter needs tab browsing like Firefox. Everyday I need several documents open at once. It looks awesome, I love OpenOffice. Keep up the good work guys. March 22, at 1: March 22, at 2: March 23, at